The elusive nature of evil: part two

Submitted by rlp on Wed, 09/24/2008 - 19:17.
0

A disclaimer before I go on:

I am in no way an expert in any behavioral science. Nor have I made a disciplined and thorough, academic study of psychopathic behavior. I’ve read a lot, thought a lot, and engaged smart people in conversations. Here are my thoughts, for whatever they are worth.

*****

Serial killers have strange sounding names. Corrl, Chickatello, Fish, Dahmer, Gacy. Or maybe they have the power to ruin a name, to twist it somehow, so that it sounds off-key in our ears.

Bundy.

See what I mean?

Clearly serial killers have embedded themselves, almost mythically, into our cultural consciousness. We are afraid of them, and even mentioning their names gives some people the shivers.

“They’re psychopaths,” people say. And then, as if you didn’t get it the first time, they repeat the word. “PSYCHOpaths!”

Psychopaths are people who cannot feel for others. They don’t feel pity or compassion. They seem to be missing some precious human component that most of us take for granted. Psychopathy exists on a continuum, as does almost everything. Serial killers are on the far end of that continuum. There are many people in our world who have a hard time feeling compassion. That doesn’t make them bad people or likely to become serial killers. Most of them do the best they can. You have probably known people like this. These are people who seem rather cold and distant. They can be a little selfish or even narcissistic.

I’ve read about psychopathy, but I can’t understand it at a gut level. If the psychopath cannot imagine what it means to feel love or compassion, I can’t imagine what it would be like NOT to feel those things. What I’ve looked for is some explanation of what a psychopath experiences, what life is like for him or her. So far I’ve not found anything that describes the condition emotionally in ways that help me to understand it.

So, like any good writer, I simply made something up. After a number of years of trying to understand the mind of a psychopath, I’ve come up with a way of thinking about how their minds work. I offer this to you for your consideration and with the complete understanding that it is simply my best guess.

I will describe this imaginary person as a man, because almost all serial killers are men.

Imagine that you are in a room full of people. All of them are holding bricks. To your great surprise, these people seem very attached to these bricks. They dress them in little clothes, coo at them, and tell stories about them. They take turns holding each other’s bricks, and they pet the bricks gently with their hands. Everyone seems to be having such a good time with the bricks.

Suddenly, a brick is dropped and broken. The entire room is seized by a collective spasm of grief and horror. Some people run over and desperately try to put the brick back together. Others stand about crying and sobbing uncontrollably. All the while, you stand there, stony-faced, trying to figure out what is going on. You’re a smart person, so you obviously understand that everyone likes these bricks a lot. But you cannot muster any feelings for them, either positive or negative. They are just bricks. So what if one is broken?

People look strangely at you because you aren’t showing emotions. You solemnly nod and try to look sad and concerned because you want to fit it. But it is impossible to make yourself feel something that you do not feel. No one can do that. You can't make yourself feel compassion or sympathy for a brick.

Over time you begin to understand that there is something missing inside you. And you can tell it is something that is very important and wonderful. You pretend to care about other people because you need to get along and because you would like to be a part of the game of love that everyone else seems to be enjoying. You become rather sophisticated at this, saying and doing the right things at the right time.

You do feel something that you call love, but it is only a very selfish and primitive kind of love, though you have no way of knowing that. For you, love feels more like possessing someone, having them for your own. You also have a sex drive. You understand that need. You are fascinated by women and drawn to them sexually, though you aren’t able to care for them as individuals. This causes you a lot of difficulties as you repeatedly try and fail at one relationship after another. Having the sexual drive without the caring component means that all of your attempts at romance have been stilted, awkward, and unsatisfying. You have a few relationships, but certainly not with healthy women. Over time you develop some very unbalanced ideas about women, and your anger grows.

There is one feeling that you have and recognize. It is the wonderful feeling of having your own needs met. When you get something you want, you feel a surge of happiness. Every human experiences happiness, of course, but since you have fewer avenues to find happiness, you cling to this one kind of happiness with an obsessive need that is very dangerous. You will stop at almost nothing to get what you want, because other people don’t really matter, and getting what you want is the greatest feeling in the world.

I don’t know how close to reality this picture is, but I believe it is a better way to think about serial killers than simply calling them monsters or saying, derisively, “They don’t feel anything!” as though they have some control over that. The psychopath is dealing with a limitation that causes extraordinary problems living with other people, and we should recognize that no one ever chooses to be a psychopath.

The psychopathic personality is but one component in the volatile mix that ultimately produces a serial killer. There are at least three components, as far as I can tell.

First, there is the psychopathic person, who is created by a combination of genetic, biological, and environmental factors that are not clearly understood by experts. I'm not sure our experts are even close to understanding these factors.

Second, there is the present environment or situation in which a psychopath finds himself. In the right environment and with some help, perhaps this person finds ways of coping. In other environments, his condition worsens.

And finally, there is the most mysterious component of all – human choice. Most people in the worst circumstances still do not become serial killers. There is the matter of our freedom and our choosing. In all human behavior, one choice leads to another. Choices along a certain path become both easier and harder. It is easier to hurt someone the second time and easier still after that. And it is harder to say no to an addictive need the farther you go along the addictive journey. But at the beginning, somewhere, you had some choices.

At the end of many paths are extreme behaviors that seem insane to most people. There are people who weigh 900 pounds and cannot get out of bed. They are not the only people with eating disorders, and they did not fall into that situation easily. There are men whose entire lives revolve around the acquisition and consumption of hard-core pornography. The end-of-the-line stuff. Any reasonable assessment of the content of that pornography would reveal that it is not beautiful or sensuous in any common definition of those words. Those who crave it might not even enjoy experiencing the acts depicted. But they lust after their pornography with an intensity that is frightening. In most of these cases, there were combinations of emotional and/or mental illness AND personal choice all along the way.

So too, those who lack any recognizable ability to love and feel for others. Some of these find themselves in some unique or tragic environment that feeds their psychopathy. And some of these, in weakness, make a series of choices that lead them down an unthinkable path to the end of the line. By the time they reach the end, they have very little freedom of choice left, if any. But it is this critical choice element that means they are responsible for their actions. To take away their responsibility is another way of dehumanizing them.

Serial killers must be held responsible for hurting others, but our growing understanding of the complex nature of their personalities must guide us as we decide how to deal with them.

Coming next: What we should do with serial killers when they are caught, both from a cultural and a spiritual point of view.

rlp

Bricks & Other Objects of Disinterest

I think you are getting at something important with the brick analogy.

For me, the important thing to recognize is that there is indeed a continuum, and the serial killer, while an extreme, is not so terribly different from the rest of us.

As human animals we are perpetually dividing the world's sentient beings into "us" and "them." It is incredibly easy to begin down the slippery slope of devaluing and dehumanizing the "others." All tribalism, all nationalism, indeed just about every -ism other than "idealism" is based in this distancing and separation.

Just as we are now appalled by the atrocities human beings have perpetrated on one another based on the ideologies of difference, I am convinced that one day future generations will judge us for our callousness to the rest of creation (and particularly the feeling, suffering portions of creation that we cheerfully exploit for our own convenience and pleasure).

I always feel just a wi bit

I always feel just a wi bit silly saying things like this, but dont you think there might be, in addition to all of the things you mentioned, something deeper and perhaps more mystical than those elements?
Something like "the devil"?

I mean as the root cause of

I mean as the root cause of such things

Very thoughtful and I think

Very thoughtful and I think insightful. I'm curious for the next installment. The one part I question a little is the part about the psychopath being happy when his needs are met. "Happy" suggest a kind of inner peace that I doubt is actually present. More like a temporary easing of certain pains and pressures. Some urge has been satisfied. But I have a hard time believing that the guys who tortured those poor Houston boys were happy while they were doing it. And if they are not happy, maybe we can still be angry but also make a little room for pity.

this is the best explanation

this is the best explanation i've ever read, and after searching the web for ages i came here just to see what you have been up to lately, and i see that you have a better understanding than most people. thank you for this :)

*tilts head*

Insightful to say the least.

Elusive Nature + Population Size

I reckon that our huge cities make evil easier to hide in some ways. People fall through the cracks and get no help or support, and are easier to ignore. When I lived in a tribal community, the people whose behaviour was a bit odd were very visible. They were kept "under surveilance" a little bit... in an oddly kind sort of way.

I'm challenged by what the difference is between a Ted Bundy and Guantanamo Bay. In Australia, we would ask what the difference is between Ivan Milat or Martin Bryant and our Immigration Detention centres. These were well known, hugely destructive of people, and perpetrated over years; the things done were extraordinarily evil. And done by people, who mostly, we wouldn't call psycopaths. The "Sytem" has something psychopathic about it.

Andrew Prior http://churchrewired.org

I have a brother, who on the

I have a brother, who on the outside is completely normal, even quite successful. Yet he has explained his emotional state almost exactly as you have imagined and written. His performance is outstanding, but he wonders why he doesnt feel anything, he has said he wishes he did feel happyness and love, because he sees how it effects others around him, and he has sometimes wondered if there is something wrong with him because he just doesnt feel, but of course he doesnt worry about it for too long.

From what I have experienced and read about abusive and hurtful people, another thing they have in common that seperates them from our "normal" standard is that they do not have empathy. Some studies have shown that this could be from not experiencing empathy themselves, so the only way they could have it is to be given it. Im not sure if there is a developemental stage where this is critical, or if its still possible to achieve past this developmental stage.

I liked your 'brick theory'.

I liked your 'brick theory'. It puts things in perspective. To the guy that has the unfeeling brother.
Does he not have love or feelings towards you or his family?
That's the part that is hard for me to grasp. If there is no love coming from him, how is your relationship? He aknowledges that he feels no happyness. Is he in a constant state of depression? Have you noticed he has always been like this?

Jae: it is hard to grasp. He

Jae: it is hard to grasp. He says he has sparks of feeling emotion sometimes, (I should ask him what triggers the sparks) and he "knows" he loves us, but wishes he felt it. Our relationship is usually doing things or talking about intellectual things, thought processes, actions etc, but not emotions. He has recently started reading a lot of psychology and self help books, but says he can only analize them intellectually, he cant relate to the emotional side of things.

He is usually quiet, but still always the life of every party with his one liners and ability to read people and always say and do just the right things. I dont think anyone would know unless he told them. He doesnt appear depressed and has said he is probably too content because he doesnt have any ambitions or goals other than to live each day as it comes, to take it just as it is.

I dont relate him to evil, partly because he is my brother, but also because he is so passive and content. His lack of motivation drives me crazy. He says he wants people to like him and tries not to do things that they say will hurt them, so he doesnt seem like he would hurt someone either intentionally or unintentionally. But I think he has made the choice to make himself aware, which has made him more aware of how different he is in not feeling. He has just started to talk to me, so I am curios where it will go.

I meant to say he has made

I meant to say he has made the choice to make himself aware of others feelings, which has made him more aware of his lack of feelings.

Bricks

Hello, my old friend!

I happened to see your book on my shelf, and it reminded me to stop in and say "Hi." It has been a few years, and I reminisce about our past discussions.

I want to say that I think you are on to something here with the brick analogy. I have been doing a lot of work in criminal justice/mental health, and this is an idea that I will rely upon.

Thanks, and hope all is well with you.

tjh

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Syndicate content