A Chance to Write for Salon.com

January 9, 2006 - 9:38am

I'm pretty thrilled to have been invited to write something for Salon.com. They asked me to watch the pilot of NBC's new series, "The Book of Daniel," reviewing it and including some commentary on the negative reaction from the religious right. This is very big deal to me and quite a lot of fun. Or at least fun in theory.

"The show is Friday night. We need your piece by Sunday."

Oh yeah, deadlines. This is something I'm familiar with, though my own self-imposed deadlines here at Real Live Preacher are very flexible.

The writing muse loves to be gently courted. Not seduced, not tricked, no one night stands. Where you take her is VERY important. My current spot is Caffegio, a little coffee shop here in San Antonio. It's usually not crowded and doesn't have the rush, rush feel of Starbucks. The last Foy story was born there, and the labor was the easiest in memory.

However, if you have been faithful to your muse, been patient and indulgent, on occasion you may demand her favors, as I did yesterday. Just don't try that too often or you will kill her.

The piece goes online sometime today. I'll post a link then.

rlp

Submitted by Anonymous User on January 9, 2006 - 10:19am.

Hey, Preach: Congrats! I love Salon -- follow it religiously, so to speak. Can't wait to read your review. I'm intrigued by the show's concept -- flawed minister from flawed family tries to do right by God. Plus, guest appearances by Jesus! So -- can you give us a hint? Thumbs up or down?

Stephen

Submitted by rlp on January 9, 2006 - 10:31am.

Thumbs down from my point of view. It's just way too over the top. I wasn't offended in the least. It's just a bad show as far as I'm concerned.

Submitted by WonderSheep on January 9, 2006 - 11:25am.

I think it's funny, all the Christian bloggers and boards are saying they hated it because it was too 'contrived' or they had 'too many problems', and all the non-Christian bloggers and boards who watched it are saying, "This is real life! I'm going to watch it every week!"

______________________
SWS
Ecclesiastes 7:13

Submitted by Anonymous User on January 9, 2006 - 11:11am.

I wish they would've kept Joan of Arcadia on the air.

Submitted by church nerd on January 9, 2006 - 11:12am.

I read your review. It was amazing. Unfortunately, I did not get to see the tv show. I must be living under a rock, as I did not even hear about it until this weekend. While it would have been interesting to see, something tells me I didn't miss much.
Your words concerning the show, however, are words that need to be heard regardless of whether or not we have seen the show.
Thanks!

Submitted by Pascale Soleil on January 9, 2006 - 11:18am.

Haven't read your review yet. But ooooh, I hated that show.

[edited]

Okay, now I read your review, with which I basically concurred.

.

I have to say that, as an Episcopalian, I tried very hard not to especially mind that it was my particular denominational ox that was being gored.

.

Unfortunately, what this show reflects most of all is that it's a Desperate Housewives wannabe: but it's neither as well-written or as familiar with its milieu (which is essential for effective satire) as that show.

.

The writers are TOO IGNORANT about the religious context to make their satire in any way meaningful. I guarantee you that they do much more research about police procedures and emergency room protocols than they every did about the day-to-day lives of big church rectors.

.

What annoys me the most is that I'm going to have to keep watching this appallingly bad show (bad writing, not one character to give a hoot about, laughable plot) so that I can respond knowledgeably to people who ask me ~ especially as an Episcopalian ~ "so, is it really..."

.

Gaaaah!

.

both2and: beyond binary

Submitted by kevinjbowman on January 9, 2006 - 11:28am.

I thought the show looked horridly stupid and decided not to tune in. I was glad you confirmed my opinion and that you pointed out the wonderful example of Godliness left to us by Daniel, and his 3 amigos, in contrast to the self promoting boycotts and rallying cries of Pat and Jerry. (It would really be funnier if Pat had been named Tom, but Oh Well)

Submitted by Anonymous User on January 9, 2006 - 11:45am.

Dude. Where have you been? I thought all good christians of conscience and level headedness went the way of the Dodo. Read your review. It was awesome. Thank you so much for making me chuckle and remember why organized religion in the hands of zealots is an oxymoron. True religion lives in the heart, not on a placard thrust in your face! Thank Preacher Man.

Submitted by jeremyca on January 9, 2006 - 12:30pm.

Hello Preacherman. I tried to watch the show as well, and I just could not bring myself to sit through the entire show. I thought it was terrible too. Terribly BAD! Your article for Salon was right on the money! Oh, I forgot to mention that your christmas CD was amazing! so anyways, I think you were right in your assessment of "The Book of Daniel."

Submitted by Anonymous User on January 9, 2006 - 12:33pm.

I read your piece in Salon and immediately followed the link over here to bookmark you. I'd just read some of it to my wife who exclaimed, "Wow, a real Christian." Of course, I should probably mention that we're Jewish Buddhists, but the words of Jesus are quite clear, and we have immense respect for anyone who tries to live their life by them.

You nailed the show for what it was. It's the same tired, TV sitcom, dramedy formula, with a religious frame rather than legal, medical, law enforcement, etc. Nobody's out to damage Christianity. They're just looking to make a buck, and they're less hypcritical about it than, say, Falwell, Robertson, Tilton or any of their ilk. Less damaging to Christianity, as well.

Nice bit of work, sir. Oh, and I miss Joan of Arcadia, too.

Slideguy

Submitted by The Token Catholic on January 9, 2006 - 12:49pm.

My problem with the show was that A.) it was boring and B.) completely implausible. And, yeah, I wanted to like it, if nothing else to piss off the fundies. A woman as a bishop was nice--it's always good to see women in leading roles in churches.

Submitted by Bob Smietana on January 9, 2006 - 5:25pm.

Gordon

Great review -- especially this line, "Jesus was nice and all, but he was a straight-up ass kicker. Believe it" and this one, "Trust me, the Babylonians were much worse than NBC."

Preach it.

BTW, how did you end up with a lady writing muse. Mine's more like Stephen King's-- fat, hairy, and smoking bad cigars, and living in the basement.

Submitted by rlp on January 9, 2006 - 6:48pm.

Must have been the luck of the draw. Mine has the laugh of my first girlfriend, the voice of Terri Gross, the wickedly crooked smile of Ellen Barkin, and she can write like a cross between Annie Dillard and Emily Dickinson.

And makes sugar cookies!

Submitted by Anonymous User on January 10, 2006 - 8:24pm.

Congrats RLP! Definitely a big deal to write for Salon. I'm jealous! - chick truths