Tom Is Back

July 3, 2006 - 7:38pm

Tom is back. With a vengeance. Long time RLP readers may remember Tom. He's my minister friend whose wife left him. Then his church fired him because they were too holy and righteous to have a divorced minister in their church. And you know what? I have no quarrel with their right to their own theology and practice. Their theology is their business, and they must do church in a way that seems right to them. But they fired Tom immediately and with no sensitivity to what that would do to his life and his ability to make a living. Boom. You're fired. You're out. Their actions were punitive and angry. They could have let him resign, but they didn't. And a Baptist minister who is fired might as well find a new way to make a living. Tom sells insurance now, which is a good living and honorable, but it's not his vocation. It's not where his heart lies. In his heart he is a pastor, a shepherd.

Tom limped into our church after his life fell apart. We all fell in love with him and his three kids. And he fell in love with us. Now it's hard to remember what church was like before he came. For a long time he was angry, and he didn't think he would ever be interested in being a minister again.

But now Tom is back. He does almost all the weddings at our church. He preaches sometimes, helps lead a contemplative ministry we are developing, and teaches Bible classes now and then.


Click for larger image

That's him in the back, the guy in the robe flashing peace signs. Maybe in the first photo he did rabbit ears behind the people in front of him and then raised his hands for the second photo. I wasn't there, so I can't be sure. Knowing Tom, anything could be true.

The thing is, Tom doesn't put up with church shit anymore. He's taken the worst a church can dish out, but he still believes there is the potential for grace and beauty in a spiritual community. He doesn't play church games these days, though he will take a silly picture after he does your wedding, if you want him to. If Tom does your wedding, you have to be ready for a man who will never again take religious stuff too seriously. He may have taken church too seriously once, but never again.

But I don't really care about any of that. I look at this picture and my heart feels like it is going to burst in my chest. Because Tom is back, and I love him.

rlp

p.s. - Tom is cool with me posting this.

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 3, 2006 - 9:23pm.

that is awesome. The Church needs more pastors who don't put up with the shit that goes on in most churches

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 27, 2006 - 2:39pm.

DUDE! YOU ARE AN INSPIRAION! KEEP UP THE CALL!
I WAS DIVORCED A 4 MONTHS AGO AND I'VE BEEN PASTORING SINCE JAN 1ST. MY WIFE SAID, "I'M TIRED OF CHASING THE MINISTRY" I REFUSED TO SIGN ANY PAPERES AND SHE STILL GOT WHAT SHE WANTED AND I'M DOING WHAT GOD WANTS!
I BELEIVE THAT GOD HAS ANOTHER WIFE MORE SUPPORTIVE THAN THE 1ST ONES WE HAD!
PASTOR JEFF
WWW.EMMANUELLABORERSMINISTRIES.ORG

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 3, 2006 - 9:27pm.

Good for Tom. I spent 20 years in full time ministry and then have been on the outs for the divorce thing for about three years. I am now preaching part time and the Bible class I am in let me teach again just recently. Churches are hard on divorced ministers. Why can't they see our hearts instead of just our marital status?

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 3, 2006 - 10:50pm.

Yea for Tom--for grace and resilience. Fun "June wedding" theme too. In your earlier post, you said 2 weddings stood out for you. Will you ever tell us about the other one?

Submitted by woundedhealer on July 3, 2006 - 11:57pm.

Gordon,

You know that I have followed how Tom has been doing since his "ejection" by the church in which he used to pastor. Tell him that I am so glad for him and proud of him. Thank you for giving him a place to heal and grow - thank God for mercy and wide places of love and life. My "ejection" taught me to not put up with church shit too.

Pete

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 4, 2006 - 6:11am.

ah, redemption - beautiful, beautiful, beautiful! thank you for sharing!

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 4, 2006 - 6:29am.

Good for Tom that he was . . . . dear god, what is the groom wearing!?

Submitted by txredd on July 5, 2006 - 8:42am.

Whatsamatter -- you've never seen a Nehru collar at a wedding? :D A better question might be "what's on his feet!?" (nothing) It was an unorthodox event and quite wonderful.

-txredd (the mom)

Submitted by Keith on July 4, 2006 - 7:14am.

One of the things that's struck me the most since I first started reading your blog is the similarity between church stuff and any other stuff. In order to do a good job at what I do, I have to care more about the work than the job--which means showing up to the job willing to walk out every day. I don't always manage the attitude (especially when money is even tighter than usual), but things work better when I do.

Am I reading this entry right if I'm taking away from it that Tom is now caring more about the work than the job?

Submitted by rlp on July 4, 2006 - 7:33am.

I can't speak for Tom's mindset when he was a pastor. We were friends then, but not very close friends. We've grown close since the events that led him to our church. So I don't know. But now, yes. Tom cares about the calling, the vocation, the work. We'll see where that leads.

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 4, 2006 - 7:35am.

As the saying goes, "One door opens as another closes". This is a fine example of church at it's worst and at it's best, as I know only too well.

Michael

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 4, 2006 - 7:35am.

Hurrah for Tom. What a grace-filled day, the day he came to your church. He looks, well, positively JOYOUS.

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 4, 2006 - 7:45am.

I do remember Tom's story from way back. And I remember feeling horrified that the church took such action. Unlike you, I don't feel nearly as accepting of the church's theology. Do they eject everyone from membership if their spouse dumps them? There are certainly things I don't like about my denomination (United Methodist)but at least they don't throw out their ministers for making the same mistakes fifty percent of the population at large make - I have several divorced UMC pastor friends who are still pastoring churches.

But that wasn't the point of the story, was it? The point is that your community provided Tom a place to heal and to return to his true vocation. Thanks be to God for places where the body of Christ really is just that.

oops, forgot to log in -- this is harper

Submitted by rlp on July 4, 2006 - 8:18am.

Hang on there, Cowboy. Let's be clear. I said I was accepting of their RIGHT to have a theology and a church practice of their own choosing. My right and yours is not to attend their church or have anything to do with them if we don't like the way they do church. Which right I joyfully excercise, by the way.

But do they have a right to fire their minister? Of course they do. Sadly, they could have been kinder and still remained true to whatever theology they have. And it is THAT for which I not only fault them but dislike them and am angry at them and have no respect for them.

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 4, 2006 - 10:49am.

Got it! Sorry, I read in haste. By the way, it's "cowgirl"...I play the harp which makes me a "harper", hence the name.

Submitted by rlp on July 4, 2006 - 11:44am.

oh, sorry Cowgirl. ;-)

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 4, 2006 - 7:51am.

The best pastor I've ever had the privilege of knowing was a divorced former-Baptist Presbyterian. Without his influence in my childhood, and without the teaching and leading he provided--along with the 'teaching and leading' of those who left our Upright Church in 1972 when he was hired in spite of {gasp!} being divorced, and {GASP!!} remarrying--I doubt I'd have any faith in churches at all.

I love the superball analogy. I'm taking it to our next Session meeting for Body Life. OK with you?

Blessings on Tom for bouncing. The photo cracks me up: Old School, and New School. And deep, deep joy across the entire frame.

--Lora in IL

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 4, 2006 - 8:15am.

Having just been "eliminated" from my church, still licking the wounds, I can identify with this. thanks.

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 4, 2006 - 8:27am.

RLP, be careful.

Look at what you wrote here. For part of the post, you're talking about something that God defines - being a pastor - but you talk about it only in the terms of men. God is perfect, people are imperfect. We screw up everything we touch when we do it in our own strength and in our own way.

Take this, for example: "I have no quarrel with their right to their own theology and practice. Their theology is their business, and they must do church in a way that seems right to them."

No! We absolutely must not "do church" in a way that seems right to us. Things of the church should never be of "their own theology and practice", they must always be of God's theology and intent. At least it must be that way if we intend to faithfully follow God's instruction to us in His Word.

1 Timothy 3:2 speaks to this: A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife

1 Timothy 3:7 does as well: Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.

I cannot read the Bible in the languages in which it was written, so I have to rely on commentaries to more fully understand meaning. From them, I understand that blameless doesn't mean perfect (as it does elsewhere in the Bible), it means that his conduct must be irreproachable. Divorce may not exclude a man from ministry, but the Bible is clear that it does exclude him from pastoring a local church. At least this must be so for God's local churches.

You also wrote this: "It's not where his heart lies." Tom's heart isn't the issue here. God's heart is. Being a pastor is something that God ordains, not men. His intent is what matters. The hearts of men change all the time. God doesn't change.

James 1:17 - Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning.

So, be careful. Are you doing what seems right to you or other men? Or are you doing what seems right to God? There is a huge difference.

Gary Petersen

Submitted by storiteller on July 4, 2006 - 9:29am.

You seem to implying that Tom has done something horribly wrong, which from the situation RLP described, he hasn't. If you read the original post, Tom's wife kicked him out of the house and left him. He appeared to have no choice in the matter. Jesus said that divorce was permissible if one of the spouses was unfaithful to the other, and forcing a spouse out of the house certainly seems unfaithful to both the person and the relationship. Perhaps if Tom himself had asked for the divorce, RLP's feelings would be different. Perhaps not. But from the situation at hand, it seems as if your judgement of Tom is unfair.

As for where Tom's heart lies - I think RLP was implying that Tom's heart lies in ministry because that is what God designed him to do. Rather than accusing Tom of not following God, perhaps you should examine the motives of those who threw him out in a deceitful manner. If they had shown him respect as a person and a preacher, their motives might have seemed more pure, but telling them that they supported him and then firing him without any notice seems to suggest a hint of being more concerned with image than values.

Also, what church does not have their own subtle version of theology and practice? Everyone believes - or at least hopes - their version is God's version. And to some extent it is. But although most churches' theology is strongly rooted in the Bible, different perspectives result in many different interpretations and variations on policy. We are all struggling to understand and live God's word, but none have a perfect grasp on it, which I don't think anyone can deny.

- Shannon

Submitted by Ysabel on July 4, 2006 - 9:41am.

Thank you, Shannon. This was far more polite than I could've been, and yet covered the heart of what I thought. (I don't think I could've responded in a form that would be at all appropriate here, in fact, so I didn't.)

Submitted by Anonymous User on August 15, 2007 - 3:38am.

"Jesus said that divorce was permissible if one of the spouses was unfaithful to the other."

Totally agreed with

http://divorce.womaninfo.net/christian-divorce

Submitted by rlp on July 4, 2006 - 10:17am.

Gary,

First, I try to be nice in responding to comments. But I don't like you. I'm tired of people like you. I wish you would go away and never come back. I can't stop you from coming here to read and comment. Well, actually I can ban your IP but I won't. But I wish you would go away. I'm sorry, but when it comes to Tom, I'm not going to be nice.

You are the kind of person who did this to him.

Oh, the classic language of the fundamentalist. I've heard this kind of crap so many times. "It's not the church's opinion or Tom's heart, it's the heart and opinion of God that matters." That sort of thing sounds so holy and righteous. You can almost see the darlings in the front row getting the vapors.

But I don't fall for your shit. I don't care how holy your language sounds. The heart and opinion of God in this matter are unknown to you or to anyone else. But the fundamentalist makes a great logical leap. His or her opinion, even a fairly uninformed scriptural opinion, somehow is the heart and mind of God.

Listen: There is NO opinion but ours and the Church's on this matter. We read scripture and we try to do what is right. That's all we have. Maybe you haven't noticed, but there is a wide range of theological opinions out there. That's not because some people are stupid or disobedient or not listening to the scriptures. It's because this stuff is very unclear and hard to sort out.

Take for example the scripture you quoted, the one that is often used when telling divorced ministers that they are no longer worthy of God's service. "A bishop must be the husband of one wife."

Okay, let's talk about that. First, what is a bishop in the New Testament? No, I'll wait for your answer. This is your issue and your passion. You do the work and get back to us. But do good work. You better come back here with some analysis of the original Greek word, context, and historical Christian ideas of what it means to be a bishop. We'll wait for you to get back to us on that. Surely a man with your passion will be eager to do so.

But for now, let's assume that every pastor or minister in a church is the equivalent of a bishop. So he shall be the husband of one wife.

Hey, I have no problem with that. As far as I know, Tom has never been married to more than one woman at a time. He was married to only one woman, and she left him. She walked out and never came back. Now he is married to no women at all, though he might like to be married again someday.

In the world in which Paul lived, there were people who lived, either married or as if they were married, with more than one person. It's called polygamy and some practice it even today. How can you be certain THAT isn't what Paul is talking about?

I wonder if in your opinion, an unmarried man is worthy to be a minister? A literal reading of this verse would suggest not. Of course that is hard to reconcile with Paul's encouragement of Christians to remain single in his first letter to the church at Corinth. What if Tom's wife had died? Could he be a pastor then, do you think? He would no longer be the husband of one wife. Can you not see how complicated and unclear this is?

And you should understand that the burden of certainty falls squarely on your shoulders. You better damn well be certain when you are dealing with people's lives in a situation this filled with grief and this tragic and painful.

But you can't be certain about this. And that's the tragedy. People like you throw people like Tom out with the trash because of your insanely narrow view of scripture and your incredible arrogance to equate that narrow view with the will of God.

How grevious it must be to the Holy Spirit of God when one of God's servants is cast aside and his or her gifts are silenced. Being as serious about the New Testament as you are, I'm sure you know what the New Testament says about those who grieve the Holy Spirit.

Your warning to be careful? Perhaps you should heed it yourself.

Submitted by The Token Catholic on July 4, 2006 - 11:19am.

I haven't had my morning coffee yet, so my higher brain functioning hasn't kicked in yet.

You know, one of the reasons why I like being Catholic is that rules aren't absolutes, but rather something to aspire to. (The whole difference between anglo-saxon and Roman law.) We all screw up, we all have the same chance for redemption.

Another reason why I like being Catholic is that the sacraments (and let's throw in ordination, for the sake of argument) are pure gift--we aren't worthy to receive them, but they're given, anyway. They're also something that can't be taken away by other people. (Annulments are more or less a determination that the sacrament never existed in the first place, which I think is far more compassionate than trapping people in horrible relationships.) Also assuming for the moment that one's clergy (as are we all) are supposed to take the place of Christ, then I'd say Tom was true to his vocation when he was rejected, just as Christ was.

And a contemplative ministry? COOL! (Says the closetted Trappist.)

http://bigumuse.blogspot.com

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 20, 2006 - 8:43am.

Token Catholic,
I just had to add my two cents. I'm a "catholic" too, and although not gong ho about it, I find that my faith is not something I would do without for many of the same reasons you put forth. It is really comforting to know that there is forgiveness if I falter, and that I am not "designed" to be perfect. I thank God every chance I falter for that since I was brought up with the idea that we all screw up, and that it's ok. That instead of beating ourselves and others up over our short comings, we pick ourselves up and try to do better. I think that is a blessing which saves our sanity and gives us a little of that much needed compassion that Christ tried to impart.

I'm not saying that to be Catholic is better or worse than any other religion. I'm sure not many other religions have had as many scandals and have been kicked about as much. I'm just glad I have it, because I KNOW I am not perfect. I don't think I'd even try to be good if I knew that if I faltered I wouldn't get another chance. Something a nun used to tell us when we were bad in school has stuck with me: "only God is perfect, we just need to come as close to that as we can." I Thank you Sister Celestine for that, wherever you may be. It has charged my life with hope, and compassion.

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 4, 2006 - 3:43pm.

What rlp said.
I didn't comment because I was afraid of the reaction about/against women clergy.
I tend to avoid conflict like this for I know that there will no winners. For some of us this is a very painful subject -- those of us who relate very directly to oppression. Oppression is still prevalent in our society for those who do not conform to what has been seen as the morality of the Bible and a morality defined for generations. If we espouse to conform to the ethos of the Biblical record, then it would be legal and moral to own slaves. If we were to conform to what some perceive as the biblical record, women would not cut their hair and men would give away their material possessions to the poor.
We will each one day stand before our maker and answer for our behavior. Will you be an oppressor or stand with the One who upholds the oppressed?
rev mommy

Submitted by Keith on July 4, 2006 - 5:34pm.

I tend to avoid conflict like this for I know that there will no winners

I think it's easy to forget the lurkers. The combatants aren't going to change each other's minds, no, but there are dozens?-hundreds?-thousands? of people, both now and in Google's future, who will read the discussion and think about it. Those people--and I count myself among them, seeing as my reading religious blogs at all is a recent and decreasingly uncomfortable experiment for me--are the winners.

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 5, 2006 - 7:51pm.

I will respect your desire that I leave, rlp. My intetion was not to aggravate you and I apologize if that's what you took from my message.

I understand that you gave considerable thought to your reply to my comment. It seems to me that even having done so, you replied not by defining how I was wrong scripturally, but rather in terms of how I was wrong by your judgement. Nor did anyone else who commented.

That was pretty much my point - that deciding spiritual things in man's terms rather than God's terms is not what we're commanded to do through His Word.

Again, my apologies. Be well. Gary

Submitted by txredd on July 6, 2006 - 9:15am.

Gary, exactly how is it that you understand scripture in some terms other than man's? Because unless you have some direct connection that is unavailable to others, you are just reading the words in the book and making sense of them as best you can in the context of your own experience of the world -- same as Gordon and everyone else here.

My personal context is that I spent a lot of years rejecting God and scripture because people like you kept me wondering how anyone could see a "loving" God in the harsh and judgmental behavior He seemed to require. If the things you see in scripture really defined Christianity, then I would continue to reject it. If that means burning in hell, then so be it.

Fortunately, with the help of some fine and thoughtful Christians, I have been learning to see things through the lens of Christ's life and ministry and a different vision has begun to fall into place -- minus the cruelty and hypocrisy that I had always believed was inherent in Christian faith. I still have a lot to learn, but I am more hopeful than cynical now.

Submitted by Keith on July 6, 2006 - 4:42pm.

Gary, I'm not even religious, so you may want to ignore me entirely--but this one seems like an easy answer to me.

"Wrong scripturally" doesn't actually mean much, because the scriptures aren't unambiguous and it's not clear which passages are understood exactly as God intended.

If they were, and it was, there would be one religion, and everyone would either accept it or deny it. There would be no splitting off of sects based on interpretations of scripture.

So all anyone has is their own judgment of what the scriptures mean. As I see it, you're using yours by claiming to know absolutely what God's terms are. I don't think you do. I don't think RLP does, either. I know I don't.

But I think I know a guy mistaking his own judgment for absolute truth when I see it. I think I see it.

Submitted by prchrj on July 6, 2006 - 1:54pm.

Once again I am hearing the same old rhetoric -- not that I have ever tired of hearing the word and what it has to say to us, both as pastors and as congregations. But that is not the issue as I read this post. Tom was ejected simply because he and his wife, imperfect human beings, made an imperfect marriage, and perhaps (and I do mean "perhaps") formed an imperfect alliance that ultimately fell apart. For this and this alone he was ejected from a pulpit ministry to which God had called him through the voice of that congregation.

Do we churches do "church" as we see fit? You bet!! As as a former Baptist and Baptist preacher's kid, I know all too well how an understanding of doing "church" hinges far more on the cultural norms of the area than being in sync with Scripture. Forbearance and forgiveness? I never saw so much Scripture quoting as when someone did something that "everyone knew was out of God's will" when in fact, it was a cultural thing. Divorce is sad and a tragedy to all involved. But it happens, just as many of our human relationship fail. How many of us pastors preach Sunday after Sunday with the knowledge that we are at odds with persons in our families? People we haven't allowed into our lives for years! Yet we sit in judgment on those who marriages fail due to poor nurture, too much time spent on congregational concerns and not enough on the marriage and family in question, public pressure to be just a little bit more perfect than any other family in the church, etc.

Tom, how glad I am that you found a church who were God's conduit of healing in your life!! How sad that your own congregation denied themselves the blessing of being that pipeline of healing to you and your children! It sounds like you are finding opportunities for doing ministry and that is a grace. May the Lord bless and keep you, and may your ministry be protected and energized by the power of the Spirit!

Prchrj

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 4, 2006 - 9:26am.

How great it is to see someone come to life again after a difficult and demeaning experience. Thanks for sharing this. And to echo another writer above, Tom could still be a minister in another denomination, if he chose. Disciples or UMC or Presbyterians would all accept him as he is. He'd have to get credentialed, which would take time and money, and but he could still fulfill his vocation.

Submitted by Ysabel on July 4, 2006 - 9:39am.

I'm glad to hear that Tom is doing better, but I'll also admit that my first thought was for you, Gordon. I find it so very cool that you care this much about him.

(And I think it's a sad statement about my experience with churches that I find that such an exceptional thing. I have met other ministers who truly cared, but they were the exception rather than the rule.)

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 4, 2006 - 10:51am.

Props to RLP for that elopquent (and fierce) response to Gary. I've kept coming back here as my husband left evangelical ministry in part because I sense Gordon's heart:

He's a true pastor, determined to defend God's sheep from the lions and wolves that would like to tear them limb from limb. How sad that those lions and wolves so often lie within their own churches and faith communities. (Gordon, I think you're more aggressive when you're defending someone else than when you're defending yourself from these types. That shows us something beautiful about your heart.)

Gary, you're not going to make a difference here with these types of posts. Go back to your own church and keep victimizing your family members with your limited interpretations of Scripture. They'll be led, limping, to horrible people like us, and we'll give them love and space to help them rebuild and remake their lives into something beautiful that God will delight in.

(And you probably will think that we're all heretics. Tragic.)

Submitted by Jim Sturges on July 4, 2006 - 11:42am.

We Episcopalians have escalated poor Gary's problems to several higher planes!

I am constantly reminded of the picture of the fundy preacher holding his plate of peel 'n eat shrimp, decked out in his polyester blend suit, condemning gays.

Where we are today is a gazillion cultural miles from first century Palestine or Greece or Turkey. Jesus' "new" command to love one another as he has loved us applies to tax-collectors, prostitutes, and fundamentalists alike. If Paul is the author of the letter to Timothy (not certain), we must remember that many of Paul's letters, like the creeds from the various ecumenical councils (e.g., Nicea), were written to correct and bound observed behaviors in a specific place at a specific time.

We have taken this pitiful handful of Pauline and pseudo-Pauline correspondence, handed down from our spiritual past, as somehow equal to the gospels. They may be of one Canon, but their subject, it seems to me, goes far deeper into the nitty-gritty (especially about church stuff) than it does into the intellectual regions that Jesus traversed.

When we are feeling as if it's time to correct one of our sisters or brothers, we need to ask if we are loving her or him as Jesus has loved us. Once that test has passed, we've got our license to act as Jesus would have us.

Submitted by xyp on July 4, 2006 - 4:41pm.

Tom is blessed to have such a place to heal.

May the "Gary Petersen's" of the "church" world have their heart broken by the things that break the heart of God.

Honesty is the best policy, but insanity is a better defense.

Submitted by brian the mennonite on July 4, 2006 - 6:05pm.

Way to go Tom and way to go rlp...I get a good feeling from this. I hope it's something that will be sustaining. There is potential for a lot of down times, naturally. Life can be so beautiful and so hard all in the same breath.

Submitted by jeremyca on July 4, 2006 - 6:29pm.

It is always a testament of God when someone like Tom comes along and the institution turns them away for one reason or another. Which speaks volumes of the presence of Christ in their actions. But you know Tom has returned and from the picture looks like he's soaring ... because he has You and Your faithful in his life, which speaks volumes of the presence of Christ in Your midst. Greatful for all things we pray for Tom's life and his continued success.

Institution is just that an Institution, and who wants to be in an institution? You don't need a building to find God, but it helps when it is raining outside, like it has been storming here. What a great story of faith and perseverance... God does provide when we get out of the way and let him provide.

Cheers
Jeremy

Submitted by smpuckster on July 4, 2006 - 8:21pm.

Great thoughts, Gordon. I have such a person in my church. Not quite as bad an experience, but he has a very simple approach to life and church that some may not understand.

Peace.

www.zzpuck.notlong.com

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 4, 2006 - 8:28pm.

What is it...which divorcees in the Ministry? I am woman, I worked for a State Baptist Convention and you would have thought I was branded with a Scarlet D on my chest when I divorced. Who else can reach people in this situation better than one who has walked the same path? How affective can a pastor be advising a divorcee unless the pastor understands the pain! URRRRGGGHHHH!!!! Divorced Ministers have their place and God can still use them. It angers me! You go Tom! Oh, and welcome back! Cenotez.livejournal.com

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 4, 2006 - 8:33pm.

Oh and the irony of it all...How can a convict find Christ in jail, come out of prison, start an evangelistic ministry and be accepted, yet a divorcee can barely get in a door at church? I has happened! Cenotez

Submitted by OldPoet on July 4, 2006 - 10:03pm.

Back up, I am about to go witch-burning midieval on your ass. Gordon et al, good points. Glad you got them off your chest. Gary's ill informed diatribe was hardly worth the words, but I understand the sentiment. Gary...seriously, get out. Go. Don't come back even if Gordon invited you to respond with your homework on Bishops and wives. Tom took some serious licks this past year and the one before that. None of them were his doing. I am infinitely grateful that the God of grace who sent him our way allowed me to befriend him and allowed me to learn from him. I count it a priviledge and an honor to know him. I love him as deeply as anyone I know. But all that love and learning and friendship was not worth one minute of the pain he has endured. Don't even get me started on his kids. So go, Gary, before we are forced to see your shriveled little feet sticking out from under some house in Munchkinland. Tom is off limits for spells and incantations. Cynthia

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 4, 2006 - 11:32pm.

yey for tom! hahahahaha! i remember the 'superball theology' post because of this Ü

Submitted by Karin on July 5, 2006 - 3:21am.

Some Christians have a strange idea of what loving one another means.

The Church is full of people like Tom who have been treated harshly by those who say they follow the God who is Love. May they all find truly loving Christian fellowship just as Tom has found in your church, Gordon, and may such love encourage them to fulfill their God-given potential, whatever that may be.

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 5, 2006 - 6:34am.

I have a theory - see if it makes sense to anyone here.

Too often, we've bought into an idea that because God is holy he cannot stand the sinful. Partly this idea comes from the bible - only the best was good enough for the rituals. But mostly it is just made-up rubbish.

God did not demand that Noah was holy before he would use him. Yes, he was the most righteous man on the earth, but he still managed to get drunk and naked (funny how that bit was never spoken about in sunday school).

Jonah said buggrit and ran away. God didn't abandon him for his great sinful attitude. He just turned old Jonah around and told him to get on with it.

Or think of Paul. Hardly a person of great and holy stature.

Think of the contrast between Jesus and the Pharisees. The pharisees made everything into a spiritual issue down to how you cut your hair and how many grains of salt you put on your chips. Jesus in contrast made a spiritual issue out of everything - ordinary stuff like mud, phlegm, grains of sand, ears of wheat, weddings and parties. Whilst some want to condemn and push-out, I'm convinced that God is actually in the business of taking and redeeming.

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 20, 2006 - 8:55am.

Well said! God is in the business of saving those who need saving. Not those that are perfect, if there really are any of those;).

Perfect example would be a vast category of saints. Didn't Saint Augustine say: "Give me chastity and continence, but not yet."

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 5, 2006 - 8:18am.

Lucky, lucky church to have a guy like Tom around. I have seen some wedding photos in my time, but that takes the cake. It makes a heart glad.

My former minister has a wonderful expression: "Our thoughts are not God's thoughts, even on our best days." My hope is that those who are living narrow lives deciding how everyone else is falling short might taste a little freedom and joy. Who knows, they might even end up making peace signs from the back row.

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 5, 2006 - 8:39am.

For scripture, why not go with the Psalmist and cite how ordination is of God and not of man with Psalms 110:4

The Lord has sworn, and will not repent, that you are a priest ever after in the order of Melchizedek.

Then go into the later explanation of this in the Epistle to Hebrews chapter seven where God declares true priesthood to be without father or mother, without beginning or end. When God has sworn and will not repent that one is ordained into his ministry then that ministry is to be everlasting. If God does not foresake or turn back God's desire then how can man?

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 5, 2006 - 10:03am.

That is great for Tom. You know, your story about him is the first post I ever read here. Incredible. I am glad to see God at work in and through him.

Peace and all good things to you, sir.

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 5, 2006 - 10:04am.

Not anonymous: That was me, Tripp...the AngloBaptist.

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 5, 2006 - 12:22pm.

Gary...seriously, get out. Go. Don't come back even if Gordon invited you to respond with your homework on Bishops and wives

////I have always cherished the superball essay and it's a happy feeling to know that Tom is doing better. And I loathed the sanctamonious crap that his church dealt out. No excuse. But I don't know if I like the "get out" message either. Anger. Yes. But banishment?
lg

Submitted by OldPoet on July 6, 2006 - 4:41pm.

I do not take kindly to someone interpreting scripture as a way to bash a fellow follower of Christ who has done nothing wrong except to marry a woman who changed her mind. You can disagree with just about anything I think, but I will never stand quiet while someone tries to make Tom feel less than. Standing by my sentiment and my words. I also don't allow people to malign my family while in my house. I am in RLPs house here and if he has a problem with anything I say, he knows he can take it up with me. We have long hours of talking and loving and comforting each other behind us.

Submitted by abiding on July 5, 2006 - 12:35pm.

"...Tom doesn't put up with church shit anymore." Yeah Tom!!!!

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 5, 2006 - 12:43pm.

HMMM...Gary is probably long-gone by now, rear-end singed and smoking from all the love and grace being flung around....

Submitted by rlp on July 5, 2006 - 7:01pm.

I get this idea. I hear it a lot. Be nice to everyone or you are being just like them. It's the classic counter from conservatives to liberals. "You're nice to everyone but conservatives."

There is a time for understanding and gentleness. And there is a time to stand up and say, "STOP IT!" Not to say "stop it" is wrong.

I thought long and hard about my response to Gary. I chose to say, "Stop it." I did that for Tom and for the Toms out there. The Garys of the world have countless hundreds of churches taking care of them and snuggling up to their theology. Tom had almost no vocal advocates but me and our church.

So I chose Tom and said, "Stop it!"

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 6, 2006 - 11:45am.

I hear you. I would stand with the "Toms" out there. I have been the victim of those using spiritual princilples and Scriptures as a weapon against God's own. Guess my inital reaction comes from the idea that Gary was being told to "Get Out" because he seemed to represent the doctrine that Tom's former church used in telling him to "Get Out". I'm still not sure, but I have since been thinking about the difference in the way Christ interacted with the woman at the well or Zacchaeus and the Pharisees or money changers.

I truly appreciate your writing and the exchange of ideas that happens. I am challenged to move beyond the trite and easy answers to examine my thinking and even more importantly, get past my thinking and examine my heart.

I recently registered so won't have to post as anonymous again. Thanks, Deborah

Submitted by prchrj on July 6, 2006 - 2:11pm.

I really don't think Gary's rear is on fire -- most fundamentalists do this to each other on a regular basis and therefore there is a proliferation of asbestos protective clothing for the backside. In truth, what was said to him needed to be said. I will never forget the "Ah Ha" moment in Historical Theology during my seminary days at Fuller when I became more aware than ever before how the American Evangelical Tradition has set itself up as the final word on so much which was out of touch with the rest of the Christian world, especially in understanding how we must all, in true humility, submit our thoughts and understandings to one another prayerfully, fully aware that God is going to point out to us all someday where we have all been wrong. I often have to remind my own congregation that I am not preaching to them as "the last word" on any given subject from the Word, but rather sharing what I believe God has given me to share, asking them to take it home and "chew the cud" as they meditate throughout the week, and allow the Holy Spirit to make it alive in their hearts. If, indeed, Gary's backside is alight, I hope it is a "corrective traumatic experience," not because of anything he may have heard from anyone here, but because he paid attention and allowed the Lord to soften his "I've Got the Truth" attitude. I hope that all I've said comes from a genuine desire to see argumentative believers moved from a "know-it-all" frame of reference to one that is willing to hear ALL brothers and sisters in Christ before making a determination that involves judgment and discernmnent as in the case of so many human relational circumstances.

Prchrj

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 5, 2006 - 1:53pm.

I'm getting on the band wagon late but took a few days off from blogs. I rarely comment here but thank you for this post Gordon. I'm sending the link to one of my best friends who had a similar experience- he was fired from his position as music minister in a non-denominational Baptist church when his wife decided she had made a mistake and should have married "the other guy." In a vicious attempt to make herself look like the victim she loudly expressed her suspicions that her husband was gay because of a few relationships he had with several gay men through a ministry in the area. The leadership refused to listen to anything he had to say and kicked him out in a public and shameful way. A year later, serving in another church for just three months and the lead pastor from his former church called to tell this new church that he was guy and he was fired again. No church community around him while he grieved his loss and deep betrayal, struggled with bitterness and tried to reconcile God's call in his life with what had happened. It's been three years but the wounds have not yet healed all the way. Just this morning we were chatting and he was questioning if this would forever stand in the way of following God's call in his life. I will share this post with him, thank you. For me, with a very different "kicked-out" story it is a reminder that God still communicates love and grace through people even when people are inclined to do just the opposite. Praise God for the healing and restoration He has worked in Tom's life through you, you and Tom are both truly blessed.

Jessica http://martin-weberchronicles.blogspot.com/

Submitted by Keith on July 5, 2006 - 2:07pm.

Better fire all the tenors, too.

Submitted by txredd on July 5, 2006 - 3:16pm.

Let's not forget the altos.

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 6, 2006 - 5:54am.

You and Tom are gradually restoring my faith in organized religion. Thank you for the wonderful testimony.

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 6, 2006 - 1:04pm.

Hallelujah. Thank God for restoration and second chances and third and fourth and and and...

Submitted by Wading on July 7, 2006 - 7:11pm.

I know this comment is now out of date, but I have been out of pocket for a week and just got back online.

First, Amen to all who are not Gary. I am divorced, remarried and called to the ministry. I just graduated from a school full of Garys and transfered my credits to a moderate school down the street to finish my B.A. I went to orientation today and talked with beautiful Christians who did not judge me, were encouraging, and respected me. It was the most wonderful feeling in the world after living for two years with a bunch of Fundamentalist.

Gordon, I may have said this to you in an email or in a comment, but I will say it again even if I have. You helped me begin my understanding of who I am as a Christian and as a minister. Your writing was what gave me my first "aha" moment that caused me to think that maybe I was being taken for a ride by guys like Gary.

People like Tom are really blessed to have friends like you as well as everyone there at the church. Please convey to Tom my deepest respect for facing his hurt head on and continuing his pursuit of God's work in his life. Guys like Tom are heros to guys like me.

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 8, 2006 - 3:14pm.

Another late comment:

I propose a small edit to the original post in response to Gary's original comment, as follows.

Instead of "they must do church in a way that seems right to them", substitute "they must do church as God calls them to do church".

Submitted by Michael Main on July 8, 2006 - 8:25pm.

I have no intention of getting embroiled in debates about divorce, or worse yet the trap of "judgement." I find both very unproductive and unflattering for all concerned.

I will take issue with some small points. Amy and I have journeyed closely with "Tom" during this time, which has been far more difficult than RLP has revealed here. We watched Tom when he could barely stand during our time of worshipping God with song, we have done our best to ease his struggles...and we too have watched him grow.

You say Tom is back as if his journey of healing is complete. I say Tom is "coming" back. I personally believe he has more healing to do, and I look forward to walking with him during this continuing season.

I also hope you are wrong when you say Tom is, "a man who will never again take religious stuff too seriously..." Personally I don't believe that's a mark of a healed minister...nor of a devout Christian. I suspect you mean Tom will never again take people, flawed "religious" people, and their distorted beliefs so seriously. Although right now I agree, Tom does not take a lot of religious stuff too seriously...I pray one day he will.

Having gone through a divorce, and felt the profound personal disappointment with myself and others - a period of my life which didn't come anywhere near the horrific, life-shattering, deep wounds Tom endured - I can tell you that healing...true healing...is a very long...very complicated process. I might suggest you brace yourself to be suprised, if not astonished, by the twists and turns it takes. What today seems impossible to even fathom may yet wriggle its way into reality.

I personally believe restoration from such intense personal and theological heartbreak as Tom has lived through requires God's time...and God's hand.

Plese don't mistake what I say...Amy and I certainly join you in rejoicing for Tom, and look forward to continuing the journey with him and our small community of believers.

I do heartily agree that Tom is indeed back... but I suspect his path of healing his relationship with God may extend far beyond our wildest dreams.

Such is the nature of the God I have come to know.

love,

Michael aka "Pepe"

Submitted by rlp on July 9, 2006 - 7:08pm.

Hey Michael,

When I said he is back, I didn't mean to imply that suddenly Tom has no more growing. I think I assumed that was implicit. How could it be anything else.

I stand by my words on religion. I don't think we should take religion seriously. Christianity? Yes. Faith? Yes. Jesus Christ? Yes. Religion is a man-made institutionalized thing. We can't avoid it, but we can't let a creation of humans rule us or define us. This I have learned painfully, like Tom.

Submitted by mrupert on July 11, 2006 - 7:54am.

You know, I just hope Tom takes this BS that happened to him and makes it work... He can use it. He can be a better preacher than ever before, not because of cynicism, but because of knowledge and experience. I say go for it Tom. Ministry isn't placed on one's heart for no reason.

Submitted by mrupert on July 11, 2006 - 7:55am.

By the way, from a photography perspective, that picture is amazingly well done. It captures a moment in time with near perfection. Wonderful.

Submitted by Anonymous User on July 28, 2006 - 9:53am.

I have read some of the comments on this website..I am so glad you are here Tom..Thank God for you..I am a preachers wife the second time..My first husband was a pastorand we were married for 27 years but I had to get out of it because of abuse, neglectand porn..I felt bad getting a divorce but I knew I could not continue on in that lifestyle..I am married again and have been almost 14 years now and my present husband was called into the ministry 9 years ago.He is divorced also..God forgives but man never forgives it seems..We have went on trial sermons but was rejected due to the fact we are divorced..Please reply Barb

Submitted by Horse on September 7, 2006 - 9:16am.

Fantastic, Gordon.

At least one Baptist church in Texas is buzzing about the exchange with Gary. Thanks for thundering at noon the words that many are afraid to whisper at midnight.

Submitted by Anonymous User on January 19, 2007 - 6:59am.

RLP you are a loving fool. "Tom" is a fornicator, a drug abuser, and a regular boozer at local bars. He's had "affairs" with members of your church...married members.

I know this for a fact.

You may love him but he's fooling you and taking your church for a ride, straight to Hell.

Don't let your love blind you. Ask "your friend" for some accountability...see if he's honest.

-Harmed by the light