The Elusive Nature of Evil

August 30, 2006 - 9:48am

Part Two

A couple of disclaimers before I go on:

For whatever reason, I seem to have the ability to write in a way that makes it sound like I know what the hell I'm talking about. So I want to be clear about this: I am in no way an expert in any behavioral science. Nor have I made a disciplined and thorough study of psychopathic behavior. I’ve read a lot, thought a lot, engaged smart people in conversations, and now I have a blog. You get what I think, whatever that is worth.

Second, I’m not concerned with the theological question of evil in this particular piece. I am interested in the problem of evil as it presents itself to theists, but that’s not what I’m writing about right now. Maybe someday I will. Maybe soon.

Third, this thing is going to take three parts, not two. I realize that now.

Rlp

------------------

Serial killers have strange sounding names. Corrl, Bundy, Chickatello, Fish, Dahmer, Gacy. Or maybe they have the power to ruin a name, to twist it somehow, so that it sounds off-key in our ears.

Bundy.

See what I mean?

Clearly serial killers have embedded themselves, almost mythically, into our cultural consciousness. We are afraid of them, and even mentioning their names gives some people the shivers.

Every FBI profiler will tell you that psychopaths are people who cannot feel for others. They don’t feel pity or compassion at all. They seem to be missing some precious human component that most of us take for granted. Psychopathology exists on a continuum, as does almost everything. Serial killers are on the far end of that continuum. There are many people who feel very little for others, to varying degrees. That doesn’t make them bad people or likely to become serial killers. Most of them wander among us, doing the best they can. You have likely worked with or known someone like this. In its mildest forms, psychopathic behavior presents as extreme selfishness.

I have read many things about serial killers. What I have looked for is an expert who would help me understand what are they thinking and feeling. What is it like to be a person who cannot feel for others? I have not found much help in this area.

After some years, I have come up with my own way of thinking about the mindset of a severely psychopathic person. I offer this to you for your consideration. I will describe this imaginary person as a man, because almost all serial killers are men.

Imagine that you are in a room full of people. All of them are holding bricks. To your great surprise, all of these people seem very attached to these bricks. They dress them in little clothes, coo at them, and tell stories about them. They take turns holding each other’s bricks, and they pet the bricks gently with their hands. Everyone seems to be having such a good time with the bricks.

Suddenly, a brick is dropped and broken. The entire room is seized by a collective spasm of grief. People cry and sob. Some run over and desperately try to put the brick back together. Clearly, these people are injured in a way that you do not understand. You try to cry so that you will fit in, but it is impossible to make yourself feel something that you do not feel. No one can do that. You feel nothing for bricks. You know what a brick is. You obviously understand that everyone else seems to like them quite a lot. But you are unable to muster any feelings for bricks, either positive or negative. They are just bricks. There are a lot of bricks in the world. So what?

This is what it is like to watch humans care for each other and not be able to participate or understand what is going on. Can you imagine what life is like for a person like this? Let's go back to our imaginary man and imagine how his life progresses.

Over time you begin to understand that there is something missing inside you. And you can tell it is something that is very important and wonderful. You pretend to care about other people because you want to participate in the game of love that everyone else seems to be enjoying. You say and do the right things, but you feel nothing. You are, as it turns out, missing many precious human emotions, most of them tied to relationships. Your idea of love is a rather selfish one, though you have no way of knowing that. For you, love feels more like possessing someone. Having them for your own. This causes you a lot of difficulties as you repeatedly try and fail at one relationship after another.

But there are some feelings you understand. You understand the strong feelings associated with sex. You are fascinated by women and drawn to them, though you aren’t able to care for them as individuals. Having the sexual drive without the caring component means that all of your attempts at romance have been stilted, awkward, and unsatisfying. You have relationships, but not with healthy women. In a sense, you feel you have always been looking into a grand ballroom from outside a window. The dancing and all that is going on inside the ballroom looks like fun, but you have no idea how to be a part of it.

There is another feeling that you have and recognize. It is the wonderful feeling of having your own needs met. When you get something you want, you feel a surge of happiness. Of course, every human feels the same way, but since you have fewer avenues to find happiness, you cling to this one kind of happiness with an obsessive need that is unusual and very dangerous.

I don’t know how close to reality this picture is, but I believe that it is a much better way to think about serial killers than simply calling them monsters or saying, derisively, “They don’t feel anything!” as though they have some control over that.

The psychopathic personality is but one component in the volatile mix that ultimately produces a serial killer. There are three components, as far as I can tell.

First, there is the psychopathic person, who is created by a combination of genetic, biological, and environmental factors that are not clearly understood by experts. I'm not sure our experts are even close to understanding these factors.

Second, there is the present environment or situation in which a psychopath finds himself. In the right environment and with some help, perhaps this person finds ways of coping. In other environments, his condition worsens.

And finally, there is the most mysterious component of all – human choice. Most people in the worst circumstances still do not become serial killers. There is the matter of our freedom and our choosing. In all human behavior, one choice leads to another. Each choice along a certain path becomes easier. And at the end of many paths are extreme behaviors that seem insane to most people. There are women who weight 900 pounds and cannot get out of bed. There are men whose entire lives revolve around the acquisition and consumption of hard-core pornography. Any reasonable assessment of the content of that pornography would tell us that it is not beautiful or even pleasurable. And yet some men crave it – lust after it.

And there are some out there who lack any recognizable ability to love and relate to others. Some of them also find themselves in some unique or tragic environment that feeds their psychopathology. And finally, some of them weakly give in to a series of horrible choices that lead them down an unthinkable path. It is this critical choice element that means that they are responsible for their actions. To take away their responsibility is another way of dehumanizing them.

Serial killers must be held responsible for hurting others, but our growing understanding of the complex nature of their personalities must guide us as we decide how to deal with them.

Coming next: What we should do with serial killers when they are caught, both from a cultural and a spiritual point of view.

rlp

Submitted by christy on August 30, 2006 - 10:25am.

I think your description of a psychopath is probably helpful and can be applied to non-serial killers who also experience some of the qualities of psychopathy. The one (diagnosed) psychopath that I've known personally could probably be accurately described along those lines. But I am certainly no expert in these things...

Insightful, as usual.

Submitted by atticus on August 30, 2006 - 11:49am.

I think your observations about serial killers is interesting. In my pursuit of understanding sex offenders more (sexual exploitation and sexual assault), I have read some excellent authors on the subject: Dr. Peter Rutter wrote Sex in the Forbidden Zone and did a great job of trying to help us see how the mind of the power-hungry works, what makes one cross over the boundary that protects the less powerful. And Dr. Patrick Carney writes much on sexual addiction, esp. from the angle of the predator. John Gonsiorek did work on the many personality types of sexual exploiters, unfortunately most of whom are non-rehabilitative. For some victims of assault, understanding what lies behind the damaging behavior is very much a part of the healing, especially if the assaulter used his kindness in the process of damaging. When the victim internalizes the predator’s kindness, she/he must de-program their thinking that has been twisted by the predator’s words. By objectifying the assaulter’s behavior, ie, reading, learning, trying to understand it from afar, the victim can slowly distance herself from her assaulter and disengage completely. It is dangerous work, this learning about what makes an evil person tick. But necessary, I think. I am glad you concluded with the fact that the predator chooses to do evil. It is a good way to end a topic that has no neat ending. Victims of evil-doers think in terms of kindness and forgiveness and wanting to wrap things up neatly and reconcile wrong-doings. But, so often things of this nature are irreconcilable.

Submitted by Mark Goodyear on August 30, 2006 - 11:54am.

Great analogy with the bricks. I wonder, though. If I keep acting like I care about bricks, will I ever begin to actually care for bricks? Can my external actions rewire my internal self?

Submitted by TheEdge on August 30, 2006 - 1:16pm.

You mention choice in this essay. I am quite curious about how a person comes to a point in their lives where bricks mean nothing. Maybe I am naive but I cannot fathom God creating someone without this key component. Whether by horrible upbringing or various other environmental conditions, it seems that a choice at some point is made to "disconnect" their feelings for bricks. Maybe this is done out of self preservation.

I guess its a new way to argue and old question. Were they born that way or did they choose it? My perfect world holds preciously to the idea that we all have a choice but I realize many examples can be given to the contrary. I understand that we are born into a fallen world but my mind cannot seem to grasp the idea that people are born evil.

Submitted by rlp on August 30, 2006 - 7:27pm.

This is fairly easy to clear up. At least clear up what I meant. I don't think that psychopaths choose to be psychopaths. No one would choose that. What happens (in my opinion) is that a person finds themselves unable to feel for others. Psychopathology happens to THEM, you might say.

Now, what is this person going to do with this hard situation he finds himself in? Will he give in to his most base instincts and begin choosing to hurt people, just because it doesn't bother him to do so? Or will he choose to seek help, learn to see and recognize his weaknesses, and try to make the best of a hard situation?

I think it is wrong to think of choice and environment as though it were one or the other. We all know that things are more complicated than that. A person starts with the raw materials given to her by God or biology or chance or however you want to think about it. What she does with her advantages or disadvantages is her choice. This choosing is a defining moment for humans.

Submitted by Anonymous User on August 30, 2006 - 2:04pm.

Gordon, you claim you don't understand what I sometimes try to communicate, but when you write about the bricks, I see that you actually do, and perhaps don't realize it.

Chuck Nolan

Submitted by Anonymous User on August 30, 2006 - 3:01pm.

I've always thought of myself as a psychopath, but not to the point where i would ever hurt a living thing. For a long time i struggled with my faith and by belief, always thinking i was this evil and perverted person and that i wasn't acceptable in gods eyes.

I'd like to think i was born this way, that my whole life led up to this, who i am now. But deep down i know i chose to be this person, we all choose who we want to be.

Well written preacher.

Submitted by Anonymous User on August 30, 2006 - 3:01pm.

I've always thought of myself as a psychopath, but not to the point where i would ever hurt a living thing. For a long time i struggled with my faith and by belief, always thinking i was this evil and perverted person and that i wasn't acceptable in gods eyes.

I'd like to think i was born this way, that my whole life led up to this, who i am now. But deep down i know i chose to be this person, we all choose who we want to be.

Well written preacher.

-Internet Strangler

Submitted by DanB on August 30, 2006 - 3:57pm.

I'm reminded of Camus' "The Stranger" on the disassociative part...

I wonder how much of that portion is 'hardwired' behavior rather than 'learned distancing'?

Nicely done, Gordon...

Submitted by Anonymous User on August 30, 2006 - 5:06pm.

For some reason, when I read this essay, I thought about those so-called Christians without the ability to have feelings for others. The ones that scapegoat others, that tell others they are going to hell and are responsible for the problems of the world. While you'd like to understand psychopathic killers, I'd like to understand psychopathic preachers.

- BuddhaBoy

Submitted by rlp on August 30, 2006 - 7:32pm.

Interesting comment. For a long time now I have noticed that Christianity is a convenient hideout for all sorts of pathologies. We are easy pickings, you might say. The church attracts people who have all kinds of emotional illnesses. An active, abusive psychopath is often looking for people to use. We all use people now and again, and sometimes we wish we could use them but do not. How easy is it to use people when it really doesn't bother you? And what better place to find people willing to trust you than in church?

The church attracts people who are like wolves among the sheep. And what better position to operate from - as a wolf - than the position of minister?

I also think that I will not hold historic Christian spirituality to blame for this. I understand that Christianity contains pretty much the whole spectrum of humanity, its good and its bad.

Submitted by Anonymous User on September 6, 2006 - 5:07am.

I also think that I will not hold historic Christian spirituality to blame for this.

I agree with you. Based on the stories I've read, Jesus was a man who loved and cared for all. He did not act in a "tribal" way (no chosen people rhetoric from him, as far as I'm aware), and cared for all, regardless of their background or history. It's fascinating to me that his example has been used (and is being used) to ostricize people, to scapegoat, to promote violence towards others, to promote tribal behavior, and to promote all sorts of things that appear (to me, at least) to go against his teachings and the direction of his life.

BuddhaBoy

Submitted by Keith on August 31, 2006 - 9:35am.

And what better place to find people willing to trust you than in church?

At a writing conference.

I've pretty much decided to stop teaching at them.

Submitted by Little Green Friend on September 3, 2006 - 10:09pm.

I found this article to be extremely interesting, although I must say that I am much more interested in the second part. I have my own feelings on those matters that I am always having to balance with my faith. I look forward to seeing your take on it.

If "He" isn't in the eschatology, it's just scatology.