Far Would

October 25, 2006 - 8:31am

I saw a sign that said, “Far Would 4 Sail.”

At first I didn’t know what it meant, but then I figured it out and laughed. It was the good kind of laugh, like when you finally get a joke.

The sign brought to mind many things I have known that seemed good and were good, only they were spelled wrong. But perhaps they weren’t wrong at all, at least not in the important ways of being wrong. Perhaps in some other place or time, they would have been right.

Me? I loved that sign from the moment I saw it. I get the sign. There is a gentleness to the word Far – so much nicer than fire. And Would looks like a little reclining couch. You could rest your head on the W and your feet on the LD. The 4 is delightfully playful, isn’t it? Like a little girl winking at you. And Sail tells you all you need to know. You could take that sign, hold it tightly to your chest, and leap off a mountain, couldn’t you? Wouldn’t you, if you could?

There is a reality to Far Would 4 Sail that feels very old to me. Older than standardized spelling and silly rules. Because the person who made that sign chopped all that would. Every blessed stick of it. Every piece of that farwould came from life and work. Every stroke of the axe was a real labor of muscle and flesh. Real living. Real life. Real work. Real love. Dammit, this person wrote it as it sounds and said it as it is. The far would person feels the reality of chopping would and stacking it in the bed of a delightfully old pickup and sailing it on the side of the road.

And what am I doing that’s so damn important? Driving by at 70 mph in my fancy car? Running a spell check on my latest essay?

This is a secret: sometimes, when I'm alone at night, and the church feels far away, and there are no nice people around, and the rules and obligations are out of my mind, I wish that I could write like the far would sign. Misspelled and brave and the hell with anything except for what is clear and obvious and right in front of my face. The stuff my body and my heart tells me is real and good.

Sometimes I imagine myself stripped to the waist, chopping away, living straight and full and with muscles flexing and straining. Laughing away the ghostly unrealities of religion and syntax and every other thing that denies the flesh. I would live only for the beauty of the moment, and I would know the eternal that lives at the cutting edge of the present. There would be no time for spelling. Hell, it wouldn’t even be on my radar screen. It wouldn’t exist.

But that is too ancient and good a way for me to live. And it would cost me too much. I sold my soul long ago, left the garden, and moved on. I live in a world where everything must be spelled correctly or no one will read it or even try to understand it. That is my world, and there is no escaping it now.

But I see the Far Would sign. I look at it shyly, like a little boy who is afraid to get too close. I see the sign and I can read it. I understand it. And I love it.

I wish for Far Would - sort of - maybe - from a safe distance.

rlp

Submitted by spidey on October 25, 2006 - 12:23pm.

this made me smile

Submitted by soandso on October 25, 2006 - 1:21pm.

I struggle with grading students papers for grammar--especially when they seem to "get it" otherwise. Somehow we've decided there's a "best" way to communicate.

Submitted by rlp on October 25, 2006 - 1:43pm.

Honestly, this really isn't about spelling. The whole sign thing is a metaphore

Submitted by Keith on October 25, 2006 - 2:45pm.

Meta4 roolz.

Submitted by Lauren on October 25, 2006 - 1:28pm.

Linguistic, poetic, ironic perfection -- thank you.

Lauren

Submitted by Anonymous User on October 25, 2006 - 2:50pm.

"Hell, it wouldn't even be on my radar screen."

To live like that...

Submitted by Anonymous User on October 25, 2006 - 3:18pm.

As one who heats with wood, I can tell you that there is a whole mystery surrounding the cutting, splitting, piling and burning of wood. I love especially to split wood because it is such a meditative action. One looks for the light cracks in the wood where the maul might split apart easily. And, in so doing, one appreciates the beauty of the wood. Stacking the woodpile is also a meditative action because one must consider how best to pile the wood so it doesn't collapse. In all, it is a time when I get to pray. (RLP, I have been remembering your father since I checked back on this site two days ago after a long absence.)

So, yes, 'far would,' says a lot. Lee

Submitted by revsparker on October 25, 2006 - 5:25pm.

you know, preacher, the only thing I can say is...
*I* love *you*

Submitted by Erin on October 25, 2006 - 7:39pm.

I wanna conjugate "sail" to "sailed" in the past tense. As in, "I sailed my soul long ago." :)

Submitted by rlp on October 25, 2006 - 8:14pm.

Ooh, nice catch. That would have been cool. Hmm.

Submitted by Anonymous User on October 25, 2006 - 10:20pm.

For a while my parents lived on a nursery farm, complete with the woodstove. It was part of my "chores" to split wood for the winter. I still remember when I chose my first double bladed axe to use for splitting, instead of a maul, or God forbid, a sledge hammer and a couple of wedges. You're right... the repetition, the stroke after stroke, with muscles either complying or complaining was... "real"...

We lose that far too easily.

RPS

Submitted by Anonymous User on October 25, 2006 - 10:42pm.

You talk about looking at the sign like a shy little boy. Did you bring up childlike-ness on purpose? This post calls to mind thoughts I've had about Jesus' emphasis on child-like-ness being key to entering the Kingdom. Children don't get caught up in formalities until we force them to, and before they become enlightened by the commercials surrounding their Saturday morning cartoons, they'll happily play with a set of blocks for ages, or even be satisfied by the joy of merely jumping and running and laughing - no flashy toy needed. For a child, it's simple to enter the "eternal that lives at the cutting edge of the present." Why is growing up always associated with making things more complicated?

Thanks for the post - great thoughts.

Submitted by Anonymous User on October 26, 2006 - 3:12am.

Nice article, but there's a spelling mistake... ;)

"There is a reality to Far Would 4 Sale"

Submitted by rlp on October 26, 2006 - 5:55am.

That's quite funny, if you think about it. Thanks, I'll fix it, he said, sheepishly and strangely guiltily.

Submitted by PastorBluejeans on October 26, 2006 - 8:14am.

Yesterday I finished my sermon for Epiphany. Gonna talk about the wise men that came from a far. Real live fire fighters.

Now if my fellow Texans in the congregation will get the joke. Or think Pastor is jest tawlkin lak alwaaays.

Submitted by dont eat alone on October 26, 2006 - 8:34am.

When I was a high school English teacher, I can remember getting lost in the process of grading papers where all I saw were the errors and not the content. I hated myself when I got like that. One night, I was almost through my overly zealous correcting when I got to the sentence that revealed the student had done it all on purpose -- she was writing that way to make a point. After that, I always read the essays first without a red pen anywhere close to me.

Eventually I left teaching because I couldn't bring myself to pick up th red pen again. I liked reading their stuff too much.

Peace,
Milton

Submitted by rlp on October 26, 2006 - 9:01am.

Hey Milton (Milton is a meat-space friend of mine)

Yes, and you and I both write carefully and fully within the rules. I mean, I want people to read me. I want to get along in the world. The funny thing about the Far Would sign is that I don't advocate dropping standardized spelling. Not that my advocacy of such a thing would make a difference anyway.

But there was something real about this sign. Maybe I attached more poetic value to it than it deserves. But I do think that religon and rules and sophistication and syntax, for lack of a better word, come at a price. I pay the price gladly, but it doesn't mean I don't know that the price is there.

Submitted by Keith on October 26, 2006 - 10:07am.

Yes, but without rules and syntax, "Far Would 4 Sail" wouldn't be anything special.

Submitted by Leslie in CA on November 8, 2006 - 7:11pm.

This reminds me of something.

There is a performance piece called Failing: A Very Difficult Piece for Solo String Bass (discussed by Steven Connor in an article called "Postmodern Performance"). It requires the performer to play a demanding piece of music while simultaneously reading an accompanying text, which describes the requirements for reading it (always at an even pace, for example, regardless of any changes in the tempo or rhythm of the music, and always paying attention to the meaning of what is being said so that the audience understands it), and then discusses the nature of failure:

"I will probably succeed in failing to succeed, not only because the music is so difficult, but because if I fail to succeed in failing to succeed, I will fail to fail, and thus miss the point, since Failing is obviously about failing, and since any successful performance must be a qualified failure."

When we have succeeded in spelling everything correctly, in being properly syntactic, in following all the rules - what have we failed at?

Submitted by Anonymous User on October 26, 2006 - 9:11am.

It's like the conclusion to a William Carlos Williams poem. It's the sign in the rain waters beside lists of groceries, apparently getting soaked, and white chickens. Thank you, RLP

Submitted by mrupert on October 26, 2006 - 10:06am.

Not really on topic, but I so miss my days in Indiana when you'd often pass signs that said "Free Firewood."

Nowadays I have to pay for it.
[From the Morning]

Submitted by Anonymous User on October 26, 2006 - 10:47am.

I love words. I love the tricks they can play. This post stopped me in my tracks, so thank you for writing it.

My husband is a very intelligent man with a condition called dysgraphia. He cannot spell even the simplest English word, so his writing does not reflect his intelligence. This is a man who has profound insights on life and shows great intelligence. However, if you were to read something he wrote, you would think it was written by a third grader. Knowing him and knowing that this condition exists has made me think twice before I assume anything about a person's intellligence or capabilities when I see misspelled words or awkwardly written language. I love language and I love this man too. There is no conflict between the two sentiments.

Submitted by Katie on October 27, 2006 - 11:57am.

I love this.

Submitted by Little Green Friend on October 27, 2006 - 2:56pm.

I really enjoyed this entry. I'm one of those people who cringes when I read blogs with spelling errors. I'm usually ok with grammar, unless someone says something like "Your stupid!" I think in some ways it hurts me that I get so caught up in the little stuff that I don't actually see the big picture. But then how many times, as Christians, do we do exactly that? I love reading the local paper around Christmas, and seeing the children's letters to Santa. It's cool because the local paper never corrects the spelling or grammar. Something about that just makes me want to read it even more.

If "He" isn't in the eschatology, it's just scatology.

Submitted by Anonymous User on October 29, 2006 - 6:38am.

Thirty years ago, my sisters and I drove past an abandoned business establishement. A few workers buzzed about, so we slowed down to see what was happening. A crudely Magic Markered sign hung in the window.

"Under New Mang."

We puzzled as we drove on about what on earth a mang might be, and whether we'd ever agree to be under one. Finally, the "aha" came. Under New Management!

Over all these years, we've used that phrase a thousand times to describe switches in leadership ("Looks like the country may be Under New Mang come November..."), proprietorship ("Man, it's a good thing this restaurant is finally Under New Mang!") and pastorate ("We'll miss good old Pastor Ernie, but it's time the church was Under New Mang.")

Some days, I'd just as soon chuck it all and sail 4 the far would, but as God's mercies are new every morning, I'm still Under New Mang.

Katy McKenna www.fallible.com

Submitted by rlp on October 30, 2006 - 6:06am.

It's funny how mispelled/misprounounced things become precious in their own way. There is a sportscaster with a radio show who was interviewing someone. This person said, "unbeeeevable" instead of unbelievable. He plays that clip now and again.

Jeanene and I will see something odd and say, "That's unbeevable."

we like it.

Submitted by Anonymous User on October 31, 2006 - 12:22pm.

Or ponybail tand? ;)

My brother used to say "ambleeance" instead of ambulance. And I think "oatmeal" was "opie-meel" to me. My mom was slow to correct. I think she knew correction would come in its own time, and would last forever...while these little sillies were fleeting and something to be treasured. I can only hope I'm as wise of a parent.

-Amanda

Submitted by Anonymous User on November 5, 2006 - 6:19pm.

Funny, when I was first looking @ the post and trying to figure out the message of the sign I came up with 4-wood for sale....I guess I've been around too many golfers lately. DannyG

Submitted by Anonymous User on November 7, 2006 - 10:18am.

I like this sign much better than one I saw: "Do not enter!!! Private property!!! Trespassers will be violated!!!"

Submitted by Anonymous User on November 20, 2006 - 1:03am.

That reminds me of a cleaning truck I once saw. On the side the words, "Quailty matters" were printed. I laughed and laughed. How ironic.