Bible
August 20, 2007 - 12:16pm
I’ve been a part of the Christian Church all of
my life. I’ve watched how things work within the faith, and I’ve been
particularly fascinated by the ways we Christians use and abuse the New
Testament.
The New Testament - the uniquely Christian part
of the Bible - is a messy collection of books and letters. No one can be
absolutely sure what parts are important and what parts are the cultural
containers that hold the important parts. In First Timothy, Paul instructs
Timothy to drink wine regularly to help with his stomach problems. It seems
unlikely that this should be understood as a universal command for all
Christians throughout the centuries. And I’m not aware of any church that treats
that passage in such a way.
Not that a glass of wine at night isn’t
a splendid idea and something I might like to suggest for some of my more
“intense” brothers and sisters.
So from the start, we have a collection of
documents that is unclear and can be difficult to interpret and understand.
That’s a good thing to know before we go any further.
From what I’ve seen, only very serious
Christians take the time to actually read the New Testament for themselves. This
collection of sacred writings taxes scholars, so it is certainly a challenge for
everyday people. We do the best we can, but no one can understand all of the New
Testament. And even those who have read the whole thing will have forgotten most
of it by the following Tuesday. The New Testament is too much to hold in your
mind.
What most Christians do is read selections of
the New Testament, usually in a haphazard manner over a period of years. They
pick out the parts that seem important or relevant to them and focus mainly on
those selected scriptures. Most people get guidance in this selection process
from whatever Christian tradition they follow. Pentecostals from Georgia find
some parts of the New Testament particularly compelling. Episcopalians in Boston
might focus on other parts.
But we all share this in common:
we pick and choose scriptures, cobbling together something we call a theology.
The word theology literally means “God words,” and a theology is a series of
belief statements about God and Jesus and how Christians ought to live.
Now it is true that a few extraordinary
Christians over the years have tried to understand and organize everything in
the New Testament. Some have created great, hulking volumes of systematic
theology that no normal person could ever read or understand. But trying to
create a systematic theology is rather like a physicist trying to come up with a
unified theory of everything. It’s a great idea, but so far no one has been able
to pull it off in a way that satisfies everyone
If what I’ve written makes you angry,
please note that I’m being descriptive. I’m simply describing what I have
seen. If you know of a monk-like person who sat on a pillar for 40 years,
can quote the entire New Testament from memory, and has now perfectly
integrated all of it into his theology and life, then your exception is duly
noted. Good for you, and good for your monk friend.
So our little slanted, incomplete, biased, and
selective theologies are the best we can do. Given how our theologies are
formed, it’s a constant wonder to me that people are surprised and even angered
when they meet someone whose ideas about God differ from their own. I’d be more
surprised if I met someone who shared my own beliefs, point by point, all the
way to the end. Now that would be strange.
Oh, and there is one other thing. There are
parts of the New Testament that are just embarrassing and otherwise inconvenient
to our modern lives. We just ignore those parts and go on about the business of
creating little theological systems that suit us.
That last paragraph is going to get me
at least 20 scorching emails. Tut, tut, please settle down.
I’m only telling you what I’ve observed. In
my experience, people either ignore or conveniently avoid reading parts of
the New Testament that are inconvenient for them.
Again, the exception of your monk friend
is duly noted.
Now this is important to remember:
all that I’ve described so far is what the best and most serious Christians
do. Your average Christian might never read the New Testament at all. He or she
likely doesn’t even know the names of the 27 writings that comprise our canon of
scripture. These people show up at church now and again. They listen to what the
minister behind the pulpit is saying and take that as gospel truth without
asking any significant questions. Ironically, these are the people who are often
the most dogmatic and outspoken about Christianity. Oftentimes it is these
people you see waving Bibles around, shouting and screaming about how every
blessed word of the Bible sprang straight from the lips of the Almighty.
Anyone who has actually slugged it out with the
New Testament, reading it carefully and trying to piece together the truth about
God, Jesus, and how we should live, will be so filled with humility and grace
that they will probably never yell at anyone about anything, much less the
Bible.
Now I’m fine with this whole process. I mean,
it’s not like we have a choice. This is the best we can do. So I’ve made my
peace with the reality of the situation. And that’s probably why I’m less
dogmatic and picky about the details than some.
But what truly amazes me is what happens when
two Christians find themselves in a dispute over some doctrinal issue or passage
of scripture. Suddenly they forget how messy the New Testament is, how
contradictory and convoluted parts of it can be. They forget that their own
theology is a product of very selective reading.
Forgetting these things, they run back to their
studies in search of verses of scripture that support their position. They pull
out books and commentaries; they scan denominational pamphlets or find help
online in locating these verses.
Suddenly, single verses are seen to support
whole theologies. Some verse from First John now has the power to shore up an
entire worldview. Some obscure phrase from Jude is thought to have the final
answer on how men and women should relate to each other. And some phrase that
Jesus used in a parable now means that people who disagree with you and your
ideas about God will roast slowly over an open fire in the pits of hell
throughout all of eternity.
These furious exchanges of quotations are like
people lobbing mortar shots at each other from trenches. Those involved only get
angrier and more entrenched. I guess eventually they get tired and stop. One or
perhaps both camps claim victory. No one generally learns anything constructive
from these battles.
How do I know so much about this? Because I
used to be right in the middle of those fights. In college and seminary, I stood
on street corners, arguing and fighting with fundamentalist street preachers. I
remember once dragging the Greek New Testament (I had all of one semester of
Greek under my belt) down to the street corner to show a sweating, shouting
evangelist an aorist verb.
He stared at the Bible for a moment, then
looked back at me. Then he shouted, “Your pride will be your downfall, and you
will burn forever in the LAKE OF FIIIIIRE!!!!!
I mean, what can you say to that? "Nu-uh!"
So now I’m gently sliding into middle age. I’m
tired of fighting over the Bible. Honestly, I couldn’t care less about most fine
points of theology. I know a little too much about how the New Testament was
formed, and I know a little too much about what’s in there and how hard it is to
keep it straight.
I have much simpler questions for people now.
“You reading the New Testament? Trying your
best to understand it?”
“Yeah.”
“Are you trying to follow Jesus as a
disciple, trying to understand what he said and live the way he did, where
possible?”
“Yeah, I’m trying.”
“MY BROTHER!”

rlp
May 1, 2007 - 8:31am
Hugh takes a crack at understanding one of the
more mysterious characters from the New Testament -
John the B. In the process he imagines
teen-age Jesus dropping a hilarious line. "Mom, why do we have frankincense in
the house?"

rlp
February 2, 2007 - 10:21am
This conversation happened last night in the
car. My wife and I both work, and I mean we work HARD. (I count my writing as
work. Shut up. It SO is work!)
Anyway, we often have no energy to prepare
dinner, but we love sitting down to eat with the girls. So we go out to eat
probably twice a week. Last night we went to a little Chinese restaurant near
our home. We just “discovered” it and are still in the honeymoon phase, raving
about their Moo Goo Gai Pan and such.
For some reason Shelby was trying to remember
some character from the Bible. Jeanene was driving.
AND....ACTION!
Shelby – Hey, who's that person
in the Bible? Their name begins with like a G or something?
Me – God?
<Laughter all around>
Shelby – No, not GOD. Someone
else. A regular person.
Me – Goliath?
Shelby – No
<Silence all around>
Me – I can’t think of any other
Bible people whose names begin with G. <Looking at Jeanene> Can you?
Jeanene – No.
<Silence all around>
Reiley – Gimli?
<Silence. I turn around and look at her. OMG,
she was serious>
Reiley – Oh, sorry. What am I
saying? Gimli is from a different bible.
<I turn around again>
Me – A DIFFERENT bible?
Reiley – Well, The Lord of the
Rings is KIND of like a bible, if you think about it.
AND....CUT!
Hmm.
So there you have it, folks. The preacher’s
daughter and her OTHER bible. Nice.

rlp
January 28, 2007 - 5:25pm
The next in the series. There will probably be one
more and then we're done.
The Reading List:
The Jewish Scriptures: Genesis, Exodus
1-20, I Samuel, selections from Psalms, Amos, and Micah.
The New Testament (Christian Scriptures):
Matthew, Acts, Romans, I Corinthians, James.
January 11, 2007 - 6:23am
Viva has the Learning Bible Discounted: Viva is
offering The Learning Bible at a discount. They can only get the hard cover, and
only in NIV. I was wrong about the NRSV being available. The NIV version is what
I have. Regularly $50, they will sell it to you for $37.50 with $3 shipping.
They didn't want me to say this,
but they will lose money on this deal. Thanks Viva!!
Okay, here's the next in the series. I made
this one #6 and renamed the last video because it really wasn't in this series.
I tried a new setting. The echo is too much, but I was in a big room. Also,
Gabe sent me a 1 gig SD card, so I wasn't
limited to 6 minutes. I'm worried that this is too long. You know how it goes,
you tend to fill up the space you have. Let me know what you think. I went 14
minutes. I could be disciplined and keep it to 10. 6 really is hard to do.
Click here to get
a copy of the Pocket Guide to the Bible.
Coming next: I reveal the coolest
lectionary study group EVER. Seriously,
even my atheist buddies will want in on this. There is, of course, one thing
you'll have to bring with you if you want to participate. And it ain't a Bible.
rlp
January 6, 2007 - 5:33pm
Note: This video is a bit
of an excursus from the series on how to read the Bible. I intended the
next video to be a discussion of some interpretive tools that are a little
beyond the study Bible. But my latest story gives me a chance to talk a little
bit about reading the Bible with an awareness of ancient worldviews.
Number 6 in the series on how to read the
Bible. Demons and the New Testament.
rlp
January 1, 2007 - 12:11am
Note: In this video
I mention a special offer from Vivabooks if you wish to purchase a book I
mention. But that offer won't be in effect until sometime Monday or Tuesday
morning. I'll post information here when the special is available.
Number 5 in the series on how to read the
Bible.
rlp
December 27, 2006 - 7:23pm
More in the series. The next video is done and
will be online in a day or so. And I hope to finish my story, "For We Are Many"
by the weekend. BTW, what's with my shirt? It looks like it would hypnotize
you if you stared at it hard enough. It's just a striped shirt. What is Google
up to?
rlp
December 23, 2006 - 5:11pm
December 22, 2006 - 3:17am
Second video. I'm beginning a discussion of the
various translations that are available to you. I'll finish this discussion in
the next video.
rlp
December 21, 2006 - 7:29am
Okay, here's the first in the series. Video #2
is already done and will be posted in just a day or two. Remember, I'm doing
this because of a specific request from someone. Sometimes just the right person
asks in just the right way. So if you have an interest in reading the Bible,
here are some practical tips and guides for you.
And can I just say that Google must have
someone choosing the worst possible frames to use as the still shots in these
videos. This looks like I'm trying to kiss the camera with my freakish, monkey
lips. Nice. Feel free to submit your own caption for this photo.
rlp
December 15, 2006 - 9:58am
November 2, 2006 - 6:58am
Zacchaeus was a wee little
man,
A wee little man was he.
These are the opening lines to a Sunday school
song that I sang many times in my childhood. The story of Zacchaeus—found in the
19th chapter of Luke—is a popular one for children. Zacchaeus was a very short
man who climbed a sycamore tree, hoping to catch a glimpse of Jesus as he walked
by. We like to tell this story to children because Zacchaeus was small, just as
they are small, and he wanted so badly to see Jesus.
Isn’t that a nice story?
Unfortunately, like many Sunday school stories,
this one has been scrubbed and sanitized until it is hardly recognizable. The
truth behind the Zacchaeus story is darker and more sinister. The most notable
trait of Zacchaeus was not his lack of height, but his lack of character.
Zacchaeus was a traitor. He collected taxes for the forces that occupied his
homeland, and he carried out this task with brutal efficiency. He took more than
was required and kept the extra. Further, as the chief tax collector, he was the
equivalent of a mafia don. Zacchaeus got a piece of all the local action...
Click here
to read the rest of this essay at
The
High Calling.

Click here to read other High Calling Bible
study/reflections
by Gordon Atkinson
rlp
August 22, 2006 - 7:12am
Someone left a a beautiful blue
box on the front porch of our church recently. A note on the top said, "For
Gordon." I opened the box and inside was an elegant, blue fountain pen with gold
bands.
The pen was left by an Episcopal
priest named Cristopher whom I met in a coffee shop several weeks ago. We had
one of those, "You're a minister? Me too! Isn't preaching wonderful except when
it's awful?" conversations that ministers often have. The next time I saw him
there, I noticed he was writing with a fountain pen. And since he is
left-handed, there was ink smeared all over his hand.
Writing with a fountain pen is a
choice. And to do so as a left hander, meaning you will always be dragging your
left hand through wet ink, indicates a serious commitment. It's like me using my
grandfather's pocket watch, which loses about 6 minutes a day. It's not
practical, nor does it make sense in an age where cheap, quartz watches lose
less than a second a month...
Click here to read the rest of this essay at
The Christian Century online.
Archive of Christian Century Articles by Gordon Atkinson

a
Christian Magazine
Christian Writing
rlp
May 2, 2006 - 9:23am
This is the third short reflection/Bible
study that I've written for the High Calling. I have a contract to write for
them once a month for the next year. This writing is a little different from
what I do here at Real Live Preacher. It's a little closer to the kind of things
I do at church.
The second chapter of Mark contains a
fascinating story about four people who brought their paralyzed friend to Jesus
in hopes that he would be healed. Unfortunately, there was such a crowd in and
around the house where Jesus was teaching that they couldn’t get near him.
Undaunted, the four went up on the roof, tore open a hole, and lowered their
friend down to Jesus.
It certainly was a brazen thing to do, if not
exactly polite. I’m guessing the homeowners weren’t too pleased with their new
skylight. Still, we understand the desperation of these friends and give them a
certain amount of credit for gumption and ingenuity. Whatever we think of their
methods, no one can deny that these four were determined and did not give up
easily...
Click here
to read the rest of this essay at
The
High Calling.

rlp
May 1, 2006 - 7:38am
Dear RLP,
I have been really confused lately, so I wanted to see if
you can help me out at all. This may be a really big question, but why is the
Bible important? I am a Christian, and I have heard other Christians say that
the Bible is God’s word, but I don’t know how they are so sure of this. Other
Christians say that the Bible is inerrant, which I can’t accept just based on my
own reading of it.
So here is the problem. How can anyone know that the Bible
is divinely inspired? And if it’s not, then why does it have any authority? I’m
really confused about this.
Andrew
_______________________________
Andrew,
If I understand you correctly, you’d like to know why
Christians think the Bible is inspired by God and therefore authoritative for
Christian life. You would like to know how people came to believe that the
teachings in the Bible have a connection to the will and desire of God.
I think these are wonderful questions, and frankly I’m
stunned that more people don’t ask them. You go to church and this huge book is
dropped in your lap. You’re trying to figure out what you should do with it, and
everyone is talking about it as if the basic questions of its origin and nature
were settled long ago. Most church people believe these writings are the words
of God, so most churches begin with the assumption that you agree with them in
this regard. Sometimes church people get defensive or even angry if you ask a
question about the validity of the Bible. After awhile, curious people just stop
asking and likely stop attending church at all.
There is no reason for us to be afraid of
honest, passionate questions. People who ask questions are some of the most
interesting kinds of people I know. Truth matters to them. They want to
understand what the Bible is before they give it authority over their lives.
That makes perfect
sense to me.
I’m going to tell you the story of how the New Testament
came to be. I think this story will get you started in finding the answers you
seek. The Jewish scriptures, sometimes called the “Old Testament” by Christians,
have a similar story behind them. Here is a warning ahead of time: There is no
way to provide proof for claims about the authority of the New Testament. All we
have are centuries of tradition and a natural selection process that took place
in the early centuries of the Christian Church.
You should also know that there are Christian
scholars who specialize in this subject. I am not one of them. I know enough to
present a very basic and simplified story. There is a fair amount of
disagreement and uncertainty among scholars on many of the particulars. Still, I
think my version of this story will be good enough for your questions.
In the early years after the crucifixion, the friends
of Jesus began to spread
his teachings and story around their part of the world. They made the rather
astonishing claim that Jesus
had died on the cross for their sins and that God raised him on the third day. Those
who accepted this message in faith and tried to live according to the way
of Jesus were part of the movement that became known as Christianity.
In the beginning, those who had known Jesus
told stories of his teaching, life, and work. As the friends of Jesus grew older
and approached death, people began writing down these stories. This was
done informally at first, but in time, more formal collections of stories formed
and were called gospels, which means "good news." At the same time, Christian leaders like Paul,
Peter, James, John, and some others whose names are not known, were engaged in
writing letters of help and support to Christian communities around the Roman
world. Some of these letters were so helpful that they too were gathered into
unofficial collections.
For the next couple of centuries, the Christian
movement made use of these collected writings. Those that were thought to be written by people
who actually knew Jesus or were disciples of those who knew him were given
priority. Some gospel collections were not thought to accurately portray the
life and teachings of Jesus. These fell out of favor with the majority of
Christians. Some writings fell away and others grew more popular and were
revered. At some point in the 4th century,
the collection was made official and closed. Twenty-seven books were included in
the New Testament. Four gospels, an account of the earliest church, and a
collection of other letters and writings.
Modern Christians say many things about the New
Testament. Some say that these works are the very words of God, as if God
dictated them or perhaps even wrote them. Those who say this are often trying to
express their deep reverence for the New Testament and may just be saying what
their pastors have told them. I don’t agree with that picture of inspiration,
but I try to be gentle and kind in my disagreement.
Other Christians believe that somehow the
Spirit of God was present in the writing and collecting of these books. They
believe God was working behind the process, allowing a lot of freedom for those
who wrote and collected, but working nonetheless.
Still others might say that they don’t understand
what a word like inspiration means exactly, but they know that twenty
centuries of Christian tradition tell them that the writings of the New
Testament reflect the teachings of Jesus and have proved valuable in keeping the
Church moored to her original message of love, grace, and redemption.
As for me, I know that an ancient tradition and
many testimonies of human experience stand behind the New Testament. These
are the writings that have nurtured our mothers and fathers in faith across the
ages. For that reason alone, I have deep respect for the Bible. My own careful
study of the gospels over the years leaves me continually astounded by their
depth and by the way they continue to speak powerfully to people of all
cultures, all ages, and all levels of education. So I join myself with the
larger Christian community in affirming these writings as scripture and using
them to guide my life. The New Testament provides me with a baseline or
measurement that keeps my own spiritual journey connected to the original
teachings of Jesus and his friends.
My trust in the New Testament is an act of
faith on my part. It is my own offering to a movement that stretches back to
Jesus himself. I faithfully offer my life and belief with a full knowledge of
what I am doing and why I am doing it.

rlp
This letter
was reprinted with permission from Andrew.
Here are a
couple of
sources that provide further information
and links.
March 23, 2006 - 11:17am
So there you are, you’ve made your case, you’ve
taken a position, you’ve let it be known that you believe something or have
taken some action in response to a belief. Inevitably, someone says, “Yes, but
once you say or do this thing, what’s to stop you from saying or doing THAT
thing, or, God forbid, even THIS dreadful thing?”
Ah, the “slippery slope” argument. It’s one of
my least favorite arguments, I must say. There are times when it is appropriate,
times when human freedom is limited or circumstances will not provide the
opportunity to examine every case individually, but most of the time I think it
is on the same level as using an analogy to prove a point. Analogies make
wonderful illustrations, but they are pitiful proofs.
And I’ve noticed that some people tend to use
the slippery slope argument frequently. Apparently, once you start using the
this kind of argument, it is hard to know when to stop.
Sorry, I couldn't resist saying that.
Let’s take a look at the
idea of the slippery slope.
It goes something like this: One person makes a case for doing or thinking
something we shall call A. Another person, one who is against A for one reason
or another, argues that once you allow A, it is either inevitable or likely that
you will also allow B, C, D, and E. And since any or all of B through E
are wrong or unwise or dangerous, it is best to avoid A as a precaution. It’s
basically the story of Pandora’s Box repackaged and offered to the discussion
at hand.
The reason that A leads to B and so on is
usually not mentioned, which disappoints me. If you use the slippery slope
argument, I feel you should also be ready to explain why it is a valid concern
in a given situation.
In some cases, human weakness is the culprit.
In this scenario, A might not be so bad, but it will make B through E more
tempting and harder to resist. Or perhaps A is some sort of logical Rubicon.
Once you cross A, there is no logical reason for not crossing B through E. There
is even a rather codependent sociological twist to this argument. If you do A, then other
people will follow, and they might do B through E. And you, a right and decent
person, obviously should take responsibility for those people as well as for
yourself.
I have to tell you that I’m not particularly
crazy about ANY of those reasons. Back of each of them is the assumption that we
will be unable to deal with every situation individually, as it occurs.
Once I told someone that I did not think the
events described in the book of Jonah had actually occurred. The story has great
spiritual value, which is why it was included in the Bible, but I felt there was no real history behind it.
An alarmed Christian person said, “Yes, but
once you say that Jonah didn’t really happen, what’s to stop you from saying any
or all of the Bible didn't happen?”
I’ve heard this same argument with regard to
scripture a thousand times over the years. Here is the appropriate response:
“Well, let’s see. I believe that Jonah was not
swallowed by a great fish and vomited up on the beach. But I believe Abraham was
a real person. Further, I believe that David was a real king of a real Israel. And I believe
that Jesus was also a real person, one who worked miracles and died on the cross
for our sins. See now, that wasn’t so hard, was it?”
One of the joys we have in being human is in
exercising our freedom to choose and to take each case as it comes to us. We are
not robots who are forced into behaviors by their programming. We see things; we
think about things; and we choose our course of action or beliefs appropriately.
And as long as that remains true of us, we will live every day of our lives on
one slippery slope or another. There is no reason to fear this.
As a matter of fact, all of the really
lovely and interesting things that humans think and do exist on slippery slopes. Love, parenting, sexuality, boundaries (both geographic and emotional),
spirituality, morality, legality, economy, consumption and production. Really
there is no end to this list. In truth, I am at a loss at this moment to think of ANY human endeavor
that does not exist on a slippery slope of some kind.
So relax. Keep your eyes and your heart open.
Think and believe and act. Changing your mind is always a respectable option.
Hopefully your heart will follow in time. Fear not the slippery slope, for we
have been slipping and sliding throughout history.
It’s a part of what makes us human.

rlp
March 10, 2006 - 9:41am
One of the things I like most about the Bible
is the motley and flawed collection of characters that populate its pages. There
can be no doubt that we share a common humanity with them. Here is Noah, lying
drunk in his tent and having a conniption fit when his son walks in and sees him
naked. There is Abraham fooling around with handmaidens and sacrificing his
wife’s honor to protect his own skin. Jacob is one of my favorites, wheeling and
dealing, conning people out of everything from birthrights to baby goats.
It’s all there, humanity on display in the
pages of scripture: Sampson’s vanity, David’s lust, Solomon’s greed, Jonah’s
racism, Herod’s bloodlust, Thomas’ doubts, and Paul’s sermons—so boring that
once a young man fell asleep while Paul was preaching and fell out of a top
story window...
Click here
to read the rest of this essay at
The
High Calling.

rlp
February 23, 2006 - 6:34pm
Theology can only
ever be simple thoughts from simple minds that are forever trapped in moments of
time.
You want to know how it happened? I’ll tell you
how it happened. I got tired. I couldn’t do it anymore. I fought an inward
battle with orthodoxy for years and tried to figure out what the Bible has to
say about this. I took six years of Greek, hoping the original language of the
New Testament might shed some light. I got a Bachelor’s degree in religious
studies and a Master of Divinity. I read everything I could find and talked to
everyone I respected. But in the end, it all came down to this – I could not be
orthodox in this matter. I could not. So I gave up and gave in. And the minute I
did I felt a flood of cool relief, like water after forty days in the desert.
The moment of choice came, and I chose to stand
with my friends. That’s the deal. That’s the way it happened. I wish I could
tell you that my rigorous study finally unlocked the secrets of the New
Testament’s scant witness on this matter, but it never did. For twenty years I
asked this question of the Bible and never got a clear answer. Finally, I
realized that I could wait on the Bible no longer.
I had to choose my place in the middle of
uncertainty, ambiguity, and doubt. I had to make a choice. I had to stand on one
side or the other. The bottom line is, I don’t give a damn what you think the
Bible says. I’m not going to stand against my friends on this. I can’t. I
cannot. I am unable to stand against them and not collapse from sorrow and
despair.
Whatever this says about me, I willingly
accept. You say this makes me a liberal? What does a label like that mean when
laid alongside real living? You say I don’t respect the scriptures? It’s been
years since I had the energy or the desire to argue about that with anyone. The
truth is, I’m okay with any label you want to give me. Only I’m not going to
stand against my friends. I’m not going to do it.
I’ll tell you what I told God on an evening
that started out like any other, but ended up being the night of the choosing.
That was the night I watched a video interview with Lewes Smedes, called
“There’s a wideness to God’s mercy.”
“Dear God, I am unsure of what is right because
there are people I respect on both sides of this issue. But I cannot stand
against my friends and remain emotionally healthy. It will kill me to stand
against them. I cannot do it. Forgive me for my weakness, my fear, my
unwillingness to take chances, and for all the times when I have been wrong and
believed the wrong things. I pray that you bless whatever goodness you find in
me. You know my heart and my desire.”
There was darkness over the waters and over me
for so long. There was no wideness to God’s mercy in those days. I did not know
the way out of the darkness, so I chose the way that seemed right to me. Having
chosen, I will not turn back now. It is finally done, after all these years.

rlp
For my brothers and sisters in Christ -
Dave, Brian, Carol, Dylan, Tom,
Don, Jeremy, Brenda, Lou Ann, and Julie R.
View the Lewis Smedes Video - "There's a Wideness to God's
Mercy."
Transcript of the Video.
January 1, 2006 - 11:02am
Well, I got me a little writing gig, which is
good news. I've written hard these last four years, and I have learned a lesson
of writing. Writing well takes a big chunk of your life. You either find ways to
make money doing that, or you make peace with the idea of living with less.
These days I spend about half of my professional life writing. The other half is
given to my church. My goal is to string together a number of small writing
incomes that will eventually be enough to justify the work.
I am absolutely unafraid of this journey and
have no anxiety about it. I have a sense of peace about this. It seems right. So
far everything that has happened since I began Real Live Preacher has been an
encouragement to keep writing. So I'm just following a path that seems to be
laid out before me.
The
H.E. Butt foundation owns and operates
Laity
Lodge, which is my favorite retreat center in the world. They do
other nice things, including providing free summer camps for thousands of needy
kids. They have contracted with me to write 12 short bible study/reflections
over the next year. One a month. Piece of cake. This is the kind of thing I do
every week and have been doing for about 20 years. Now it's not exactly Real
Live Preacher stuff, you understand. RLP is me with very few limits. And that's
good too, in its place.
These will have a touch of my attitude but will
be more, well, bible studyish, I guess.
I hope you enjoy them.

rlp
December 10, 2005 - 8:55pm
Some months ago I wrote an
essay for
Christian Century about my first experience viewing a facsimile of
the Saint John’s Bible. I recently acquired my own copy of “The Gospels and
Acts,” the first to be released of seven volumes that will comprise the entire
Bible. When I opened it the first time, I spent about half an hour turning every
page and gazing with wonder at the amazing illuminations. Even this facsimile is
truly a work of art...
--Click
here to read the rest of this review.

Creation image from volume 1, The Pentateuch (not
yet published)
Click here for a larger view
Used with permission from Liturgical Press
November 21, 2005 - 2:20pm
Evaluating my own writing is a tricky matter. I
know what I'm looking for in an essay: clarity, a new and interesting take on a
subject, perhaps a new way of looking at something common and familiar, real
passion and vulnerability, and writing that sounds good so that reading it feels
like running downhill. You don't want to stop.
I have my own opinions about the work I've done
at Real Live Preacher, but I've come to understand that what happens when the
written word meets the reader is beyond my understanding or control. Sometimes
I'm not completely happy with a piece - maybe I never got comfortable with it or
maybe I stopped being able to hear it before it was done - but then I find out
that it meant something to someone. I'm always humbled and amazed by this.
I wrote something in 2004 and called it, "Mark
Twain." I worked harder on that essay than most. And when it was done, I liked
it. But it's never been picked up by anyone. As I recall, Christian Century
passed on it. So I was happy that the "Wittenburg Door" published it in their
last issue.
Mark Twain
"A man once told me that he believes every
word in the Bible. I was struck dumb with amazement.
He
Believes
Every word in the Bible
There is no part of that statement that
makes sense to me..."
Click here to read the rest of this essay
at the
"Wittenburg Door" online.

rlp
July 8, 2005 - 12:03pm
Children living on the edges of time zones are the ones most aware
of the arbitrary nature of timekeeping. On the Western edges, they
whine about being called indoors on summer evenings when the sun is
still shining. On the Eastern edges, they are rightly offended when the
winter sun starts to go down at 4:30 in the afternoon.
Even the best of our adult explanations are not good enough for them. They know something is not right...
Click here to read the rest of this essay at The Christian Century online.
Archive of Christian Century Articles by Gordon Atkinson
 a Christian Magazine
rlp
May 23, 2005 - 9:31am
A few months ago I was allowed to view a page or two from the Gospel According to Matthew in the famous Saint John's Bible, which will be a priceless masterpiece when it is finished. The calligrapher is using ancient tools and techniques to produce a handwritten copy of the Bible, filling it with beautiful art that is reminiscent of ancient Bibles but with a modern flair. Even the pictures on their Web site will take your breath away...
Click here to read the rest of this essay at The Christian Century online.
 a Christian Magazine
rlp
The Saint John's Bible Images & Illuminations
January 25, 2005 - 10:46am
There is no such thing as The Gospel in the same way that there is no such thing as a circle. The Good News, like the perfect circle, lies forever beyond us and out of our reach. What we have is the gospel according to. Nothing more and nothing less...
Click here to read this essay at The Christian Century Website NOTE: Look for the Real Live Preacher graphic on the right and click on it.
************
After you've read the essay, don't miss the mysterious gospel according to Anna, online at its own website. Anna.RealLivePreacher.com

rlp
October 28, 2004 - 1:53pm
What if you and I could set aside all the church bullshit for a little while? I'm serious. Just for the purpose of a good conversation we would forget all the huge buildings and the tortured, organizational labyrinth that supports them, the marketing sound bites, the appalling TV shows, the whole Christian subculture that is such a mystery to the outside world, the creepy I love Jesus so much language, the stunning hypocrisy, all of it. What if we could just forget all of that for a time?
I know we can't really set all that aside because McLuhan was right. The Church is our medium and this medium is now our message. Most definitely our message. The only message we know anymore. There's no escaping that. But you and I are friends, and we can do whatever we want when we've had a couple of beers and are talking about crazy things that should be but are not and perhaps never will be.
You see the battered, black New Testament sticking out the back pocket of my jeans, and you ask to look at it. You bend the leather back and forth, noticing how loose and worn it is. The gold letters are long gone from the cover and the pages have pulled away from the spine.
Wow, you really read this thing, don't you?
Yep.
So you think it's a good thing to read? I mean, there's good stuff in here, right?
Absolutely, but it takes some work. It's not easy reading. I wouldn't recommend doing it alone. Not in the beginning anyway.
Well, just could you maybe tell me what the deal is with Christianity? What's it all about? Is it just learning everything that's in the Bible, like an academic exercise or something? Cause that's kind of unsatisfying to think about, you know? Actually, I'm sorta interested in why Christianity exists in the first place. Is there something fundamental you guys are saying about reality? I know this is kind of impossible, but could you sum it up for me or something?
I take back my Bible and look at it. I put my thumb on the edge of the pages, bend the cover, and flip quickly through it. The whole New Testament rests in my mind, ordered, progressing, some parts working against others and toward creative tension, the stories of HIM, the first stories of us, our first God words, our first problems, finding grace, finding faith, trying to live well, the shocking end.
But these stories cannot be told quickly, and there is something further back that you want to know, something beneath and behind this book.
I lift the Bible to my nose and smell the pages for some odd reason that even I do not understand. I close my eyes and try to think about how I want to say whatever it is that I'm going to say. There's so much, my whole life, this journey, primitive impulses, archetype, desire. One word jumps into my mind - poetry. I decide to run with that idea. I have only a vague sense of what I'm going to say, and I know that I'll be working a lot of it out even as I speak.
You know I like to write a little bit.
Uh, yeah. I HAVE been reading Real Live Preacher.
Oh yeah, that was stupid. Okay, whatever. Anyway, when I write an essay I have to finish it. I could keep going over it and over it, but finally I have to put it online or send it to an editor or something. That's always a little hard, but that's the way it is. You have to finish it and move on.
Yeah?
Poetry is different, I think. I wonder if poems are ever really done. It's like Whitman with Leaves of Grass, you know? Sometimes I think of starting a poem that I would never even consider finishing. I'd just keep working with it until I died. And over the years it would change because I would change. I would work it until it was like the smoothest music that ever caressed your ears. Just the sound of it would be incredible, and maybe the sound of it would be all you'd need. And I'd never be able to send it to any editor because it would never be finished.
See, I think Christianity is like a human poem, written over thousands of years by people who have a sense that there is something more important for us than just waking up every day and going about our business. I'm one of those people, I'm afraid. I know that makes me seem a little foolish to you, but maybe you have room in your life for one goofy friend, huh?
Lord! Just go on with what you were gonna say, for Chrisake!
Okay, for Christ's sake I will.
Yeah yeah, you're funny. Whatever.
Anyway, so what we feel or sense - or whatever you want to call it - is so far down inside that it's unthinkable to let go of that feeling, that need, that urge to keep looking upwards and outwards. It's like Someone is trying to break through and give us hints along the way, but the hints are all we have, powerful and compelling though they may be.
I would say that if Christianity is poetry, then the Bible is our syntax, meter, and rhyme. The Bible contains the rules, but sometimes we are free verse poets, pushing on the boundaries, edges, and gray areas. We stretch this grammar to the very breaking point at times, led by the Spirit. We are engaging the Creator morally, putting theological meat on our bones. And the poem we are creating is our very lives, filled with the hints we've received along the way and the stories of our search for God.
The story behind our poem is the one that was given to us out of the mists of the past and between the pages of this book. It is a story about the goodness of the world and the searing reality of the evil that tears at the fabric of creation. Setting things right is unimaginably expensive and impossible for anyone but the ONE who stands behind it all.
Our poem, I would say, is an ongoing and never-ending attempt to put all that we feel and have learned into words that anyone can hear, the rich and the poor, the brilliant and the simple-minded, people of today and people of tomorrow. And it's only poetry, you see, that speaks across so many barriers. Only poetry can do this."
"So we read this book over and over, struggling with it, trying to understand the sense and the structure of what is beyond us. And sometimes we do get a sense of what lies beyond, a whiff of Him, a feel for Her, a love of It. And when you begin to get It, you see things in a new way and begin to live boldly in this world like crazy people and like brave people and like silly people, even like old and very young people.
But that's just the way I see it, so take that with a grain of salt. Everyone gets to be involved in this poem, which makes things very messy, I know. There is no escaping the big mess that we call Church, but somehow a stunning grace exists that helps us to know that even our mess is an important part of this poem.
I guess this wonderfully human poem will never be finished. There is an editor, I think, but he/she/it apparently has no firm deadline and a lot of patience. We keep getting our manuscripts back with a lot of red marks, but also a smiley face and these words:
Keep at it. I like where we are going with this.

rlp
About Marshall McLuhan
Walt Whitman's Leaves of Grass
September 13, 2004 - 6:04am
A man once told me that he believes every word in the bible. I was struck dumb with amazement. He Believes Every word in the bible
There is no part of that statement that makes sense to me. He might as well have described the secret contents of every woman's heart or the sharp edge of every child's pain. He could have been explaining a unified theory of everything or summarizing the federal budget on his thumbnail for all I knew.
He? Him? One person? One man makes this claim? One man has seen these words, felt them, breathed them, fought with them, cried over them, been broken by them? One man knows their story and can piece together their ancient context? One man understands the grace behind the surprising progression of these words across the Testaments?
Believes? Who can understand the meaning behind that word? Is there a vocabulary that can communicate the soul-jarring collision that occurs when emotion meets intellect and intuition struggles against wisdom? Is there a language that can describe this leap of faith, this heroic standing in the gap, this tragic and joyful commitment of belief that is, in the end, the only thing we have to offer the Creator?
Every word in the bible? Every word in each of these sixty-six books? I'm rightly impressed when I hear that someone has read the bible, much less claimed to know it and believe it. How does he hold all of that information in his mind at any given moment? Did his attention never waiver, not even when he read the genealogies? Did his eyes not grow heavy when Job and his accusing friends droned on and on? Is he a man, or some sort of reading, knowing, and believing machine?
He believes every word in the bible.
Surely this is some sort of marketing slogan meant only to advertise his self-image and his perceived place in the world.
Stand aside, for I am a man who believes every word in the bible!
Once I too dreamed that I might know every word of the bible. I hoped to pilot my ship across the surface of its troubled waters and know every bend and horseshoe bay. I wanted to drop a sounding line and call out its depth to my friends.
"Mark one!" "Quarter one!" "Half one! "Mark twain!"
But the sounding cry came from the heavens, and it was my own life that was measured and my own life that was known. And each time I am measured, I become a little smaller and a little less sure of myself.
I am now convinced that there is no end to these twisting waters. I will not master this river, neither its depths nor its ways. And now that I have as many years behind me as ahead of me, I have taken my pipe and seated myself by the captain's stove to have a smoke and consider these things.
I have had to make some adjustments to my expectations.
So if not the whole bible, perhaps I could know the New Testament and come to understand the foundations of the Christian faith. And if the New Testament is too much to fathom, then maybe I could know the gospel stories of Jesus. And if not the gospels, then how about Matthew? And if not Matthew, then surely the sermon on the mount could be known. And if not the sermon, then at least the beatitudes. And if not the beatitudes, then I would like to know the first beatitude.
I would like to know what Jesus meant when he said, Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven.
I would like to know poverty of Spirit, for poverty is all I am left with. I would like the courage to be made poor before the shattering depth of the Creator and alongside the unthinkable breadth of humanity. Spiritual poverty is all I ask for now, and it is more than I can handle.
My God, Thou hast given me only one lifetime and half of it is already gone.
Mark twain. I am hoping for safe passage.

rlp
Mark Twain The Sermon on the Mount The Beatitudes
February 20, 2003 - 5:23pm
After my
passionate
post on the subject of homosexuality, I've received numerous emails asking
me to clearly state my interpretation of the parts of the Bible that are thought
to speak to the issue of homosexuality. Initially I thought I would respond by
email to those wanting to discuss the Bible, but the number of emails was
overwhelming so I thought I would post my thoughts here.
I'd like to speak to this issue in 4 parts.
Part One - Hypocrisy:
If we Christians were honest, we would admit
that we do not abide by all the commandments of scripture ourselves. I don't
mean that we try and fail. I mean we deliberately choose to ignore scriptures
that are not convenient for our lifestyles. As I pointed out in my post
yesterday, the amount of scripture that is ignored, scorned, and abused by
modern Christians is incredible. This blatant disregard for scripture never
seems to bother church people when the issues at hand have to do with their own
sins. But suddenly, when the subject of homosexuality comes up, everyone becomes
a biblical literalist. The hypocrisy of this is appalling.
I think we should afford our homosexual
brothers and sisters the same luxury we claim for ourselves. If we plan to
ignore whatever scriptures threaten our lifestyles, perhaps we should offer them
space at our bonfire to burn their little handful of scriptures as we burn the
Bible chapter and verse.
We should all agree that none of us are able or
willing to follow all the teachings of scripture. Let the one who is obeying
God's word ask for detailed scriptural explanations from others.
In my book, that settles the argument, and
there is no reason to go further. However, if you are determined to hold
homosexuals to a higher standard, demanding detailed explanations for why they
do not obey minor parts of the Bible while all of Christendom tramples on the
very heart of scripture, move on to part two:
Part Two - The Bible and homosexuality:
The Bible never addresses the subject of
homosexuality as an orientation. The idea of sexual identity was
not a part of human thought until very recently. The Bible addresses some
specific homosexual acts in very specific contexts. The idea of two people in a loving, committed
homosexual relationship was not understood in the ancient Hebrew world and is
not a subject in the Bible. Very credible biblical scholars treat the
passages in question as specific commands against specific acts, and not as a
wholesale prohibition on a homosexual orientation.
For many people, understanding this obvious
limitation of the Bible is all that is needed. The Bible does not address the
broad subject of sexual orientation because it was written before that was an
issue. Any specific condemnation of homosexual acts must be seen as just that –
a specific condemnation of an act in a specific context.
However, if that sounds too wishy-washy to you,
if it sounds too slippery and subjective, let me now speak to all 6 of the
passages in the Bible that are thought by some people to address the issue of
homosexuality.
Part Three – Exegesis
There are exactly 6 scriptures that are thought
to address homosexuality. I’ll either quote the passage or provide a link so
that you can read it.
The story of the destruction of Sodom – Genesis 19:1-29. If you read
this story, you’ll quickly see that the men of the city of Sodom wanted to
commit a brutal, homosexual rape. We simply cannot condemn a sexual orientation
because of a rape. There is a heterosexual rape described in the next passage we
will examine together. Shall we condemn heterosexuality because of this rape?
Any reasonable person will understand that this
passage has nothing to say about loving, consensual homosexual relationships.
Judges 19:1-30 is a sad story of human evil of the type that is
often recounted in scripture. It is basically a retelling of the Sodom story in
a different context. This time, however, the men actually did rape a woman. This
passage speaks to the need for God's love in a brutal world. It has no bearing
on the question of homosexual orientation for the same reason that the Sodom
story is not applicable. Both of these stories condemn ignorance and sexual
brutality, but not homosexuality.
Texts 3 and 4 are both in Leviticus and make up
a part of the Old Testament Levitical code.
Leviticus 18:22 – “Do not lie
with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable.”
Leviticus 20:13 – “If a man lies
with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable.
They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.”
The code of rules and behaviors in Leviticus
does not apply to Christians. The book of Acts, specifically chapter 15, makes
it clear that Gentile Christians are not required to keep all of the Mosaic
laws. No Christian group I know demands full compliance with this ancient code
of behavior. If we did we would have to keep kosher laws. We don’t even demand
compliance with the sexual laws in Leviticus. If we did, we would allow
polygamy, which is lawful in Leviticus. Unless you are prepared to obey all the
laws in Leviticus, you cannot blame the homosexual for not feeling bound to obey
all of them. To point to these two verses and demand selective compliance is
ludicrous.
The Old Testament really has nothing
specific to say to Christians about homosexuality. We turn now to the New
Testament.
Jesus had nothing to say on the
subject of homosexuality. His absence of comment does not support or condemn
homosexuality. Jesus was Jewish, kept the Law of Moses, and mainly dealt with
Jewish people. The issue of homosexuality was not relevant or important to his
ministry. It’s not surprising that Jesus never addressed what was not an issue
for his culture.
Paul, who lived in the gentile
world and dealt with gentiles, discusses specific homosexual acts twice. These
passages are the only two times homosexual behavior is mentioned in the New
Testament. Let me repeat that because it is important. The two passages I
am about to discuss comprise the total New Testament witness on the subject of
homosexuality.
I Corinthians 6:9 – “Do you not
know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived:
Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes
nor homosexual offenders” (NIV)
"Male prostitutes" and "homosexual offenders."
Can someone explain to me why we would condemn an entire orientation because of
the prohibition of these very specific behaviors?
The Greek words Paul used in this passage
include the word for a young, effeminate male prostitute and the word for the
older man who paid to have sex with him. Admittedly, there is some disagreement
over how these words should be translated, but let me point out that I'm quoting
from the New International Version, arguably the most conservative modern
translation available. You may disagree with this translation, but you cannot
dismiss it as ridiculous. The scholars who worked on the NIV are not
lightweights. And uncertainty and ambiguity in translation is only a
further argument for tolerance.
We can acknowledge that the New Testament
condemns prostitution and a system where a younger man makes his living
committing sex acts for money with older men. But we cannot condemn
homosexuality in general because homosexual prostitution was condemned. Paul
condemns many heterosexual acts in his writings, even in this very verse, yet we
do not condemn heterosexuality.
Romans 1:18-29 is the last passage we shall look at. It is the one
most often quoted, and it is clearly the closest thing we find to condemnation
in the New Testament. Verse 27 is the most specific verse.
I simply ask you to read this entire passage
with an open mind. In it, Paul says that those who reject God will be given over
to "shameful lusts”. They will engage in many acts that are not pleasing to God.
Men will “burn with lust for one another.”
In Paul's experience, the only homosexuality he
knew was that practiced in the non-Jewish world and probably tied to pagan
temple worship. He claims that homosexuality is one of the punishments for those
who reject God. But what are we to do with gentle and committed Christians who
love God and worship God, but who tell us that they have a homosexual
orientation?
My homosexual friends do not burn in lust for
people and run around committing scandalous acts. They are quietly committed to
their partners in love. The dilemma here is that the homosexual Christians I
know just do not fit the picture Paul gives us in Romans.
I'll be honest- I don’t know exactly what Paul
meant by this passage. I know he was describing people who chose not to worship
God and then "burned with lust for other men." I don't know exactly what he
meant, but I know this DOES NOT describe the homosexual Christians I know, who
love God with great passion.
Because of my inability to make clear sense of
these passages, I am willing to allow a person's sexual orientation to be
between him or her and God. I am willing to take a chance and err on the side of
compassion and inclusion.
Part Four – Conclusion
Those are the 6 passages in the Bible that are
thought to address the subject of homosexuality. The Old Testament passages
amount to nothing and the two New Testament passages are ambiguous at best and
highly open to interpretation.
I do not think the Bible teaches that every
expression of homosexual love is sinful. The scriptural witness on this subject
is shaky at best.
Even if you
do not buy my claim that we have no right to demand specific explanation of
scriptures from homosexuals since we don’t provide similar explanations for the
hundreds of passages we blatantly ignore…
Even if you
do not agree that the Bible never really addresses the subject of homosexuality
as a sexual orientation…
Even if you
reject my biblical analysis and decide that the Bible is condemning of
homosexuals…
Would you at least
agree that the passages are ambiguous and open to many
interpretations? Would you at least agree that others may responsibly interpret
them and not agree with you?
If you could at least
acknowledge that those of us who disagree with your interpretation are
nonetheless serious-minded people who read scripture carefully and want to
follow it, then perhaps you too would be willing to err on the side of
compassion. Perhaps you would be willing to open your churches to our homosexual
brothers and sisters, trusting them to read the Bible just as you do, with love
and hoping for Grace from God.
December 7, 2002 - 4:52pm
As promised in my very first post, here are the locations of the two verses in the New Testament where Church leaders used profanity. Actually, what they said was coarse, but not really profane.
As I mentioned before, modern translations tend to clean this language up. How unfortunate.
Acts 8:20 – A man asked if he could purchase the power of God. Peter (yes the apostle Peter) replied Your money and you can go straight to hell. That is a very good translation of the original Greek. The New International Version emasculates the passage to avoid offending silly people, translating it, May your money perish with you. Please!
Can anyone with any life left in them prefer the NIV translation to what the text really says? Peter was pissed off! This guy asked if he could buy the favor and power of the Almighty. He's lucky Peter didn't lop off his ear with a sword.
Galatians 5:12 - This passage is rather humorous. A group of people were suggesting that new Christians in Galatia should be circumcised. Paul said, I wish those who are troubling you [over this] would cut their own balls off.
Admittedly, the original Greek doesn't include the phrase own balls off. BUT, Paul did use a coarse and common term for castration. He was angry. If he lived today he would say, Cut their own balls off. Since translation attempts to render the original language with appropriate modern phrasing, I prefer my own rather earthy translation, thank you very much.
Every time I meet some uptight Christian person freaking out because someone said shit, or cock, or damn, or fuck, I laugh to myself when I think of Peter and Paul, givin em hell and cussin up a storm.
My people have lost their sense of priority and their sense or humor somewhere over the last 2000 years. I'm looking to find it again. If anyone happens to be passing through the middle ages, we might have left it by the side of the road just outside Byzantium on the way to the Holy Lands.
peace,
Preacher.

|